Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people's tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concertrating one sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material. A. The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers. B.Some advertisers switched from family newspaper to advertise in the changed publication. C.The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew. D. People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and vilence. E.It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group. Ans.C! why why ???? 作者: cranberry 时间: 2004-2-19 19:10
把问话也贴上啊作者: regine 时间: 2004-2-19 19:28 Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?作者: 番茄炒蛋 时间: 2004-2-20 09:43
只有c才能说明厂商唯一是出于道义上的考虑
而没有这个假设的话就有可能是因为其他的目的,或者是包括其他的经济上的目的
ps,可以用取非法来尝试这题,但是意义上的理解比那种方法应该更有效
作者: regine 时间: 2004-2-20 13:19
能说明c的意义?中文作者: weiyu 时间: 2004-2-24 10:27
some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations这是两个考虑; withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.说withdraw是因为moral原因, 所以The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if theywithdrew.如果withdraw将导致sales decrease所以withdraw是因为moral而非financial considerations作者: jimjohn 时间: 2004-3-13 03:14
[center][fly][/fly][/center]作者: jonathan1987 时间: 2008-9-26 08:03
我怎么觉得a很对啊?作者: metrina 时间: 2009-9-23 23:13
我也觉得A有道理啊!怎么否定A呢?