ChaseDream

标题: [求助]GWD-8-Q19: GWD-2-12在讨论帖中没有查到 [打印本页]

作者: vivian0331    时间: 2009-3-28 09:35
标题: [求助]GWD-8-Q19: GWD-2-12在讨论帖中没有查到

GWD-8-Q19: GWD-2-12

Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

 

Concerned about financial well-being of its elderly citizens, the government of Runagia decided two years ago to increase by 20 percent the government-provided pension paid to all Runagians over 65.  Inflation in the intervening period has been negligible, and the increase has been duly received by all eligible Runagians.  Nevertheless, many of them are no better off financially than they were before the increase, in large part because ________.

 

A.         They rely entirely on the government pension for their income

B.         Runagian banks are so inefficient that it can take up to three weeks to cash a pension check

C.         They buy goods whose prices tend to rise especially fast in times of inflation

D.        The pension was increased when the number of elderly Runagians below the poverty level reached an all-time high

E.         In Runagia children typically supplement the income of elderly parents, but only by enough to provide them with a comfortable living

答案是E

我看到前人的解释如下:

As children typically only supplement (补足,补充) a certain amount, so that the total amount received by elderly is only enough to provide the elderly with a comfortable living. Children's supplement will decrease in response to the increase in government's pension, so that the total amount elderly received will ,still, only be the level for comfortable living. Therefore, the elderly's total income (gov. pension + children's supplement) will remain the same.

我不明白的是Children's supplement will decrease in response to the increase in government's pension这句话哪里有体现了?我觉得题目里没有表明这个意思啊?

请大家帮忙解答一下,谢谢!


作者: alohabrian    时间: 2009-3-28 10:17
这个可以infer出来的。

比如 我原来 给你 10钱生活费。你有十块钱的消费能力。

现在,政府给你又两块钱的生活费,为什么你还是只有十块钱?

证明 我少给你两块钱。

你为何选C呢?Inflation in the intervening period has been negligible 这句话就表示,inflation对生活不造成影响。

作者: vivian0331    时间: 2009-3-28 12:02
以下是引用alohabrian在2009-3-28 10:17:00的发言:
这个可以infer出来的。

比如 我原来 给你 10钱生活费。你有十块钱的消费能力。

现在,政府给你又两块钱的生活费,为什么你还是只有十块钱?

证明 我少给你两块钱。

你为何选C呢?Inflation in the intervening period has been negligible 这句话就表示,inflation对生活不造成影响。

谢谢楼上,这个比喻很简单明了。

刚刚总结的时候,顿然悟出题目中的Inflation in the intervening period has been negligible, and the increase has been duly received by all eligible Runagians.这一句话就能排除B,C两个选项。

 Runagian banks are so inefficient that it can take up to three weeks to cash a pension check

They buy goods whose prices tend to rise especially fast in times of inflation

选项A又是一个相反答案,D无关。所以,如果是考场上我或许能蒙出E。但是,如果在考场上从题目直接理解E对我真是难啊。


作者: lcat1215    时间: 2009-8-4 11:26
我还是觉得C也正确。虽然inflation可以忽略不计,但是inflation是所有商品价格的体现。而C选项是指65岁以上老人买的东西在inflation时涨的特别快,那么政府额外的补助就跟这一本分生活支出抵消了。请NN指点。
作者: zliycwn1    时间: 2009-8-5 23:01

我的理解和楼上相同...

不过既然题目说不考虑inflation了,以后看到选项要坚决地划掉~~~


作者: 安非它名    时间: 2010-6-25 15:12
同意三楼 OG上有一题跟这题一样的,那里的正确选项跟这里的C一样意思的。   如果真如1楼那样要infer的话 那这题应该是assumption题了。
作者: 安非它名    时间: 2010-6-25 15:14
E答案本身就还需要一个assumption才成立。。
作者: bowow    时间: 2010-7-1 20:41
同3、4、5楼
作者: Growingwqy    时间: 2010-12-17 21:55
真是争议题呀
作者: sdcar2010    时间: 2010-12-17 22:12
E is right.  Final answer.




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3