ChaseDream

标题: 請教新pp-73 ~! [打印本页]

作者: kbkgqoo 时间: 2009-3-26 00:00
标题: 請教新pp-73 ~!
ffice:smarttags">

77. (30754-!-item-!-188;#058&005525)

Which
of the following most logically completes the argument below?

Twenty
percent of the stores in Morganville's downtown shopping district will fail
within five years because they will be competing directly with the SaveMart
discount department store newly opened in East Morganville. The downtown shopping district has lost
business at this rate before and has always completely rebounded. Confidence that it will rebound again from
the losses it is now about to suffer is ill founded, however, because
__________.

A.
the stores likely to be put out of business by direct competition from SaveMart
are the downtown shopping district's anchor stores, on whose ability to draw
shoppers many of the other downtown stores depend

B.
the bus line that has long connected the downtown area of Morganville with East Morganville has a tradition of
carrying shoppers who reside in East Morganville into downtown
Morganville to shop

C.
when the downtown shopping district has rebounded before, the business premises
of a failed business were typically taken over by a business of the same kind
as had been there before

D.
SaveMart's business plan for the East Morganville store is based on
earning low profits, if any, during the first five years of the store's
existence

E.
it is conceivable that the downtown shopping district could shrink
substantially without collapsing altogether

答案:A 我是覺得其他選項都不對~但是A選項後面寫說~~ 被踢除掉的這些店的招攬客人的能力

被其他區域的店家所以依賴~~~未甚麼要用"其他"店家呢??搞不懂~~!! 請指點迷津~感謝

作者: carolhide 时间: 2009-3-26 09:26
M城市中心的其他店铺都是依靠这个店铺来招揽客人的。如果这个店倒了，没有吸引力了，所以不会再rebound。

作者: kbkgqoo 时间: 2009-3-26 09:39
阿多謝多謝~!!! 剛剛再看一次~~~發現我原先把~other downtown stores 看成了~~other town stores~!!
所以會覺得~~他倒了~~其他城鎮的stores依賴他~~~好像也不能解釋這原因~~!
現在了解拉~!!! 多謝~!

作者: 盆子要革命 时间: 2009-8-27 20:13

C. when the downtown shopping district has rebounded before, the business premises of a failed business were typically taken over by a business of the same kind as had been there before 说了是as had been there before 所以就有可能今年的fail也会一样被taken over，因为它以前都是这样的啊而A相对来说就没有这个嫌疑

作者: 美小波 时间: 2009-8-27 20:44
艾。。。我要读好多遍才能看清，看明白。。。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)