ChaseDream

标题: 狒狒77,我实在是没找到前人讨论 [打印本页]

作者: 宝车冬宝    时间: 2009-3-15 06:34
标题: 狒狒77,我实在是没找到前人讨论

77. How do the airlines expect to prevent commercial plane crashes? Studies have shown that pilot error contributes to two-thirds of all such crashes. To address this problem, the airline have upgraded their training programs by increasing the hours of classroom instruction and emphasizing communication skills in the cockpit. But it is unrealistic to expect such measures to compensate for pilots’ lack of actual flying time. Therefore, the airlines should rethink their training approach to reducing commercial crashes.

Which one of the following is an assumption upon which the argument depends?

(A) Training programs can eliminate pilot errors.

(B) Commercial pilot routinely undergo additional training throughout their careers.

(C) The number of airline crashes will decrease if pilot training programs focus on increasing actual flying time.

(D) Lack of actual flying time is an important contributor to pilot error in commercial plane crashes.

(E) Communication skills are not important to pilot training programs.

其实发这道题的主要目的是想请教大家,Assumption & Support题的区别? 比如说,D是答案,因为他取非以后结论就无法成立,那么C呢(FF said “加强”)? 它的结构好像不能取非是吗? 一个条件句,失取非前半部还是后半部? 那我是不是可以得出结论,做Assumption题的时候,不能取非的选项就不会是正确答案?


作者: sausau    时间: 2009-3-15 10:41
这道题不是取非来做的。是一道断桥类型。
文中说:飞机事故2/3是由于飞行员的错误操作。结论是:那种培养交流的课程不能减少这种失误,因为飞行员实际欠缺飞行实战的症状并没有解决。
为什么说没有解决飞行实战就不能解决问题?难道培养交流不能减少错误?这就需要个桥:缺乏飞行实战才是操作错误的主要原因。

假设和加强有的时候很微妙:加强肯定是以假设为基础的。首先就是使结论成立(完成了假设),然后还起到了巩固结论的作用。两种豆可以用取非做(某些题型)

作者: hansomecd    时间: 2009-3-15 11:03

俺觉得像那些方法是你做不出题的时候才用分析方法。考场上是没那么多时间的

别拘泥于规律,要行云流水~






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3