ChaseDream

标题: 不好意思，再问OG--123 [打印本页]

作者: frankman 时间: 2009-3-11 11:54
标题: 不好意思，再问OG--123

Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman medical treatise, is undated but contains clues to when it was produced. Its first 80 pages are by a single copyist, but the remaining 20 pages are by three different copyists, which indicates some significant disruption. Since a letter in handwriting identified as that of the fourth copyist, mentions a plague that killed many people in Florence in 1148, Codex Berinensis was probably produced in that year.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the hypothesis that Codex Berinensis was produced in 1148?

(A) Other than Codex Berinensis, there are no known samples of the handwriting of the first three copyists.

(B) According to the account by the fourth copyist, the plague went on for 10 months.

(D) There was only one outbreak of plague in Florence in the 1100’s.

(E) The number of pages of Codex Berinensis produced by a single scribe becomes smaller with each successive change of copyist.

请问NN：如果在1100‘s发生不止一次瘟疫，结果会如何？D是补充推理缺陷吗？

谢谢！

作者: frankman 时间: 2009-3-12 11:41

没有好心人吗？

作者: sausau 时间: 2009-3-16 01:23
其实这道我之前做也错了

书的抄写最后20页换了3个人，就得出书的抄写过程中发生了大事情。
题目又说，因为第四个作者写信说1418年有大瘟疫，就说书是那年写得。

那么就是暗示瘟疫是那个所谓的大事情？！

如果那段时间有一次瘟疫，而第四个作者只说到一次瘟疫，那么他写的1418年的瘟疫就没有参考性了。还是取非解答

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)