ChaseDream

标题: [求助]GWD6-Q13、GWD7-Q3+有关独立主格的问题 [打印本页]

作者: Iris007    时间: 2009-3-5 12:01
标题: [求助]GWD6-Q13、GWD7-Q3+有关独立主格的问题

GWD6-Q13

Floating in the waters of the equatorial Pacific, an array of buoys collects and transmits data on long-term interactions between the ocean and the atmosphere, interactions that affect global climate.
                

(A) atmosphere, interactions that affect

(B) atmosphere, with interactions affecting

(C) atmosphere that affects

(D) atmosphere that is affecting

(E) atmosphere as affects

答案A 我不懂为什么atmosphere, 后面为什么要加名词interaction? 第二个interaction离第一个long-term interaction 这么远

是指同一个东西吗?

 

白勇语法中关于独立主格结构说明如下:

"1.独立主格结构在句首或句尾,起状语(adv)作用,表伴随原因、条件、状态等

2.一般独立主格,与主句形成松散的逻辑关系,型式为:n+n;n+Ved/Ving;n+prep phr.;n+adj phr..."

 

我的想法是:atmosphere (n), interaction (n)--->独立主格形式

这样想对吗?

 

GWD7-Q3

The state has proposed new rules that would set minimum staffing levels for nurses, rules intended to ensure that at least one nurse is assigned for every four patients put through triage in a hospital emergency room.

(A) rules intended to ensure that at least one nurse is assigned for every four patients put through triage in a hospital emergency room

(B) rules with the intent of ensuring one nurse at least to be assigned for every four patients to be put through triage in a hospital emergency room

(C) rules intending to ensure at least on nurse is assigned for every four patients in a hospital emergency room put through triage

(D) with the intent of ensuring that at least one nurse should be assigned for every four patients in a hospital emergency room that are put through triage

(E) and this is intended to ensure one nurse at least to be assigned for every four patients put through triage in a hospital emergency room

答案 A 两个rules也是离好远,可以说是dangling?

 

感谢!


作者: 小贝    时间: 2009-3-5 12:33
以下是引用Iris007在2009-3-5 12:01:00的发言:

GWD6-Q13

Floating in the waters of the equatorial Pacific, an array of buoys collects and transmits data on long-term interactions between the ocean and the atmosphere, interactions that affect global climate.
    

(A) atmosphere, interactions that affect

(B) atmosphere, with interactions affecting

(C) atmosphere that affects

(D) atmosphere that is affecting

(E) atmosphere as affects

答案A 我不懂为什么atmosphere, 后面为什么要加名词interaction? 第二个interaction离第一个long-term interaction 这么远

是指同一个东西吗?

白勇语法中关于独立主格结构说明如下:

"1.独立主格结构在句首或句尾,起状语(adv)作用,表伴随原因、条件、状态等

2.一般独立主格,与主句形成松散的逻辑关系,型式为:n+n;n+Ved/Ving;n+prep phr.;n+adj phr..."

我的想法是:atmosphere (n), interaction (n)--->独立主格形式

这样想对吗?

interactions是同位语,同为与前一个interations.

interactions是同位语,同为与前一个interations.

GWD7-Q3

The state has proposed new rules that would set minimum staffing levels for nurses, rules intended to ensure that at least one nurse is assigned for every four patients put through triage in a hospital emergency room.

(A) rules intended to ensure that at least one nurse is assigned for every four patients put through triage in a hospital emergency room

(B) rules with the intent of ensuring one nurse at least to be assigned for every four patients to be put through triage in a hospital emergency room

(C) rules intending to ensure at least on nurse is assigned for every four patients in a hospital emergency room put through triage

(D) with the intent of ensuring that at least one nurse should be assigned for every four patients in a hospital emergency room that are put through triage

(E) and this is intended to ensure one nurse at least to be assigned for every four patients put through triage in a hospital emergency room

答案 A 两个rules也是离好远,可以说是dangling?

感谢!

这个rules也是同位语。


作者: Iris007    时间: 2009-3-5 12:54

谢谢小贝,我大概懂了~

独立主格之所以会看起来这么怪的原因,就是其实它根本就是同位语

因为它要同位的名词实在太远了,或这么说,主要名词与同位语中间夹杂了一些混淆视听的东西,所以comma后面同位语的部分又重复了一次要同位的名词

Ex: 6-Q13 interaction
            
7-Q3
rules

避免同位语造成混淆

 

不知道这样观念对不对?


作者: 小贝    时间: 2009-3-5 15:06

我想,你把同位语与独立主格搞混了。

这两个都是同位语结构,不是独立主格结构。

同位语的作用是对句子中与之同位的名词或词组起到补充说明的作用,起修饰和描绘作用。同位语的目的就是为了避免修饰歧义以及修饰的准确和简洁。

而独立主格是一种从属结构,与主句有一种逻辑关系,如表原因,表条件,表方式和伴随。

LZ再细细体会一下。


作者: Iris007    时间: 2009-3-5 16:09

小贝你说得没错,我仔细想过,才发现我错得离谱()

同位语:纯粹补充主要名词的content内容(跟独立主格完全不搭嘎
            
sorry~
耍笨了
            
)

 

我把pp1-Q1的详解
            
重新念一次:

with型的独立主格、each型的、adj phr.作伴随状语、adj作伴随状语我比较容易分辨

 

But…第一类很难啊!!!

我找到一些补习班的例句,不知道算不算独立主格的第一类:与主句形成松散的逻辑关系 (补习班老师说是独立分词词组,还是我在恍神><):

 the absolute participial phrase:

(1) The key having been lost, he decided to climb through the window.

(2) It being a fine day, they went hiking and fishing.

(3) He hurries to the hall, followed by two guards. (from pp详解)
                

 

真是太谢谢了


作者: deadendjy    时间: 2009-4-4 11:11

小贝分析的很有道理,学习了。


作者: jhtcherry    时间: 2009-4-5 12:20
以下是引用Iris007在2009-3-5 16:09:00的发言:

我找到一些补习班的例句,不知道算不算独立主格的第一类:与主句形成松散的逻辑关系 (补习班老师说是独立分词词组,还是我在恍神><):

 the absolute participial phrase:

(1) The key having been lost, he decided to climb through the window.

(2) It being a fine day, they went hiking and fishing.

(3) He hurries to the hall, followed by two guards. (from pp详解)
  

你举的例子前两句肯定是独立主格,第三句不是吧~  是非谓语动词过去分词表示被动:他急冲冲地赶去大厅,后面还跟着两个守卫。(被两个守卫跟着。)


作者: raphael1234    时间: 2009-7-7 15:36
up
作者: zliycsj7    时间: 2009-7-20 14:29

作者: 苹果夹心派    时间: 2009-7-23 09:35
up~
作者: wu41385621    时间: 2009-7-26 11:08

ding 


作者: kevinli120    时间: 2009-8-5 11:03
atmosphere, 后面加名词interaction是同位语,修饰之前的interaction
作者: 赋格    时间: 2009-10-26 21:49

up,为什么B不对呢,不是with+名词+现在分词的独立主格结构么。


作者: fox900617    时间: 2010-8-23 08:08
受益了
作者: littled    时间: 2010-9-4 11:51
(3) He hurries to the hall, followed by two guards. (from pp详解)
我认为这个也是独立主格,独立主格有一种是独立主格的主语和主句的主语一致,把主语省略了
作者: 淡妆·雅    时间: 2010-9-8 23:11
还是不太明白怎么区分表伴随原因的独立主格和表解释说明的同位语
作者: 樱桃悠悠    时间: 2011-2-26 14:35
我这才刚明白独立主格和同位语是怎么一回事,之前都没有想过
作者: 小卡车    时间: 2012-4-1 19:11
我想,你把同位语与独立主格搞混了。
这两个都是同位语结构,不是独立主格结构。
同位语的作用是对句子中与之同位的名词或词组起到补充说明的作用,起修饰和描绘作用。同位语的目的就是为了避免修饰歧义以及修饰的准确和简洁。
而独立主格是一种从属结构,与主句有一种逻辑关系,如表原因,表条件,表方式和伴随。
LZ再细细体会一下。
-- by 会员 小贝 (2009/3/5 15:06:00)



感谢,更加清楚一些了
作者: xumiaoc    时间: 2012-8-11 15:14
小贝你说得没错,我仔细想过,才发现我错得离谱()

同位语:纯粹补充主要名词的content内容(跟独立主格完全不搭嘎
           sorry~
耍笨了
           )



我把pp1-Q1的详解
重新念一次:

with型的独立主格、each型的、adj phr.作伴随状语、adj作伴随状语我比较容易分辨



But…第一类很难啊!!!

我找到一些补习班的例句,不知道算不算独立主格的第一类:与主句形成松散的逻辑关系 (补习班老师说是独立分词词组,还是我在恍神><):

the absolute participial phrase:

(1) The key having been lost, he decided to climb through the window.

(2) It being a fine day, they went hiking and fishing.

(3) He hurries to the hall, followed by two guards. (from pp详解)




真是太谢谢了


-- by 会员 Iris007 (2009/3/5 16:09:00)

                        看完这几个句子我又混乱了,不是说为了idiom和避免指代不清,不能用being,少用it 。。结果,这几个句子。。。。
作者: hopscotch123    时间: 2013-8-15 21:29
额,前人举得例子,这几个句子搞昏了。。。
the absolute participial phrase:



(1) The key having been lost, he decided to climb through the window.
having been down这种形式不是一直说不能做定语的吗?求解


(2) It being a fine day, they went hiking and fishing.
这里的it指的什么?是指fine day还是形式主语?


(3) He hurries to the hall, followed by two guards. (from pp详解)
前面有人说followed是独立主格,只是省略了he,又有人说是修饰谓语hurries的,我怎么记得" , + -ed "结尾的只能修饰前面的名词呢? 疑惑的很。求解
作者: hopscotch123    时间: 2013-8-16 09:26
顶一下。路过的人帮忙看一下吧 thx
作者: hopscotch123    时间: 2013-8-17 11:24
up............
作者: 悠然的兔子    时间: 2013-10-2 09:58
hopscotch123 发表于 2013-8-15 21:29
额,前人举得例子,这几个句子搞昏了。。。
the absolute participial phrase:

同问!!!!!!!!!!!!!
作者: Alfred770    时间: 2016-4-28 13:25
hopscotch123 发表于 2013-8-15 21:29
额,前人举得例子,这几个句子搞昏了。。。
the absolute participial phrase:

修饰动词的,表示状态的一个从句。
作者: 你好呀huang    时间: 2019-9-20 23:58
Iris007 发表于 2009-3-5 16:09
小贝你说得没错,我仔细想过,才发现我错得离谱(汗)同位语:纯粹补充主要名词的content内容(跟独立主格完全 ...

同意!               




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3