In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.
Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?
答案是E,彻底没有看懂,请高手赐教
这是一道WEAKEN题 原文叙述凌乱 但是结论给出 WEAKEN结论
既正确答案WEAKEN The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public这句话
ABD选项无关 C选项有点迷惑性 关键在于supersede的理解 supersede有取代、延期的意思 如果是“取代”则支持结论 如果是“延期”则无关
E直接反对了结论 说明The state law无法影响existing local ordinances 所以那些petition的circulation没有实质效果 只会misleading 符合题干
你可能会想E项后半段有个限定条件就觉得范围不对 觉得E无关 事实上结论中的retail establishments、government offices 与 in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard是不冲突的 这也是“非充分性”的体现
关于“非充分性”的描述 见我另一篇分析
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&ID=373276&page=1
还有WEAKEN题的最高原则
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&ID=373158&page=1
祝好运!
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |