ChaseDream

标题: 新PREP 201, 即GWD30-Q4 [打印本页]

作者: jjyune    时间: 2009-2-14 21:05
标题: 新PREP 201, 即GWD30-Q4

201.
   
(25167-!-item-!-188;#058&001486)  (GWD30-Q4) 

 

 

The three women, liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection, have consistently received labor's unqualifying support. 

A. have consistently received labor's unqualifying support

B. are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor

C. have consistently received the unqualified support of labor

D. receive consistent and unqualified support by labor

E. are receiving consistent and unqualified support by labor

同位语作插入语,定从的时态是一般现在时。未划线部分没有明显的时间词出现,请问怎么判断用完成时呢?困惑哦。。。

同位语作插入语,定从的时态是一般现在时。未划线部分没有明显的时间词出现,请问怎么判断用完成时呢?困惑哦。。。

或者这句这样理解,主句动作在前,从句动作在后。正因为the three women have received blablabla... 才有从句support的动作,不知道是要这样理解的吗?要么就是要尊重原句的时态?请NN帮忙!


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-2-14 22:53:09编辑过]

作者: alohabrian    时间: 2009-2-14 22:12
浅见

除非

1.原句有明显的动词时态和状语搭配错误。(比如用过去时修饰NEVER,用完成时修饰YESTERDAY)
2.原句有明显的语法问题,而语法正确答案之中,没有和原句一致的时态。


其他情况,慎重修改原句时态。


另外,现在完成时态,一般不需要明显的时间词就可以使用,因为它所隐含的时间是现在now.



作者: 丫丫兔    时间: 2009-2-14 23:11
以下是引用alohabrian在2009-2-14 22:12:00的发言:


另外,现在完成时态,一般不需要明显的时间词就可以使用,因为它所隐含的时间是现在now.


 

原来还有这种说法!


作者: jjyune    时间: 2009-2-15 11:15

有出处吗?现在完成时,一般现在时,现在进行时,都包含now这个时间点吧?

看来这题还是原句时态优先来选了。。


作者: iam_kongkong    时间: 2009-2-16 00:10
A为什么不对啊?
作者: Austen1985    时间: 2009-2-16 14:03

labor 前面少了定冠词the


作者: alohabrian    时间: 2009-2-16 20:06

这道题时态不是重点。


The three women, liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection, have consistently received labor's unqualifying support. 

A. have consistently received labor's unqualifying support      unqualifying误用

B. are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor    unqualifying误用

C. have consistently received the unqualified support of labor 

D. receive consistent and unqualified support by labor                  consistly由副词变成形容词,改变修饰对象的同时,改变了句义。 support by误用

E. are receiving consistent and unqualified support by labor   consistly由副词变成形容词,改变修饰对象的同时,改变了句义。 support by误用


作者: fightbear    时间: 2009-2-16 21:10
还有。。labor在en里面是不是当做无生命的东西来看的。。
作者: tiffany1102    时间: 2009-4-19 22:23
up...
作者: perpetual    时间: 2009-6-21 04:16

网上搜到的:

http://www.beatthegmat.com/unqualified-vs-unqualifying-t35605.html

gmat.2008 wrote:

The three women, liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights
and environmental protection, have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support.
                    
A. have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support
B. are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor
C. have consistently received the unqualified support of labor
D. receive consistent and unqualified support by labor
E. are receiving consistent and unqualified support by labor

OA is C.

what is wrong with b??


gmat.2008

Thanks for this post. The word "qualify", in this case, means to attach restrictions to something to to limit it. "Unqualified" support is unconditional support. The -ing form doesn't make sense in this instance because the subject of the qualifying is "labor" (means workers' unions, etc.), not "support".

Does that explanation clear it up?





作者: jean1280    时间: 2009-6-25 15:19
up
作者: scarlett8327    时间: 2009-7-21 15:12
搞不清时态。。
作者: 伊布拉莫维琨    时间: 2009-7-23 16:51

作者: raphael1234    时间: 2009-7-23 19:08
up
作者: raphael1234    时间: 2009-7-23 19:20
标题: 大全Section E 16 没有搜到我想要的回答
以下是引用alohabrian在2009/2/16 20:06:00的发言:

这道题时态不是重点。


The three women, liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection, have consistently received labor's unqualifying support. 

A. have consistently received labor's unqualifying support      unqualifying误用

B. are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor    unqualifying误用

C. have consistently received the unqualified support of labor 

D. receive consistent and unqualified support by labor                  consistly由副词变成形容词,改变修饰对象的同时,改变了句义。 support by误用

E. are receiving consistent and unqualified support by labor   consistly由副词变成形容词,改变修饰对象的同时,改变了句义。 support by误用

能详细解释下unqualifying到底误用在哪里吗?


作者: 斯咏    时间: 2009-8-4 21:11
...
作者: crisy123    时间: 2009-12-28 18:22
重点在 unqualifying vs unqualified; 字典说unqualified 有unlimited, unrestricted的意思,so 'unqualified' 符合这句的logic-收到labor无条件的支持
作者: lolmandy    时间: 2009-12-29 19:37
A为什么不对啊?
-- by 会员 iam_kongkong (2009/2/16 0:10:00)
sb's doing sth 错
作者: milichen    时间: 2010-1-22 21:49
A为什么不对啊?
-- by 会员 iam_kongkong (2009/2/16 0:10:00)
sb's doing sth 错
-- by 会员 lolmandy (2009/12/29 19:37:04)



Then why?
作者: JNash    时间: 2010-1-22 22:16
窃以为所有格后面不能跟v-ing
既然插入语是一般现在是,则只有BC符合条件。
比较 unqualified 和 unqualifing. 我想,作为一种状态,应该是v-ed这种被动强调状态,而不是v-ing强调主动和持续。毕竟人家labor的support不是想去unqualifing,而是被评价为is unqualified。
作者: 超超琪琪格    时间: 2010-8-22 13:18
从朗文里查到的unqualified的用法,但是没有查到unqualifying的用法,可能前者成为一个固定的形容词了吧,而后者加了ing只是成为一个ing分词,所以那个人才会说:“The -ing form doesn't make sense in this instance because the subject of the qualifying is "labor" (means workers' unions, etc.), not "support". ”不知道这样想对不对?
unqualified  
un·qual·i·fied /?n?kw?l?fa?d US -?kwɑ?-/ adj
not having the right knowledge, experience, or education to do something
 unqualified staff
unqualified for
 He was unqualified for the job.
unqualified to do sth
 I feel unqualified to advise you.
[usually before noun]
used for emphasizing that a quality is complete and total
 The experiment had not been an unqualified success.
 He gave her his unqualified support .
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HINT
Do not confuse with disqualified , which means 'officially not allowed to do something': She was disqualified from driving.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
作者: ardor    时间: 2010-8-27 14:09
考点在unqualified。但觉得如果并非是这个考点,一般现在时的ARE RECEIVING比HAVE RECEIVED要好些。
作者: kalakala33    时间: 2011-7-8 11:09
6楼正解!
作者: metesici    时间: 2014-9-26 13:52
同意alohabrian的看法!
作者: xixio    时间: 2023-9-5 16:02
perpetual 发表于 2009-6-21 04:16
网上搜到的:http://www.beatthegmat.com/unqualified-vs-unqualifying-t35605.htmlgmat.2008 wrote:The th ...

同意!               




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3