Last year, support for the social and behavioral sciences represented only about three percent of the goverment's total budget for research funds in the United States, Thus, the particularly sharp reductions imposed on such programs this year seem dicated not by financial constraints but by social philosophy.
(A) The goverment funds allocated for research in the social and be havioral sciences are not sufficient for the work that needs to be done.
(E) Three percent is an insignificant portion of the government's total budget for research funds.
答案是E，但是想不通为什么A出错，因为social philosophy不重视，所以不给足够的资金，这也可以说通啊。而且好像比E还有说服力啊。
假设题 你用取非验证,第一个加个not,意思就是政府资金是足够的, 对原文也没有影响的吧,因为你还是可以说是因为social philosophy造成的呀
后面一个, 加个not 就是说3%是很大的一部分了,那么今年的sharp reduction not dicated by social philosophy 就说不过去
另外,我觉得E好,是因为连接了整个推论,你看last year,````3%, thus,the sharp reduction ```this year ```
我也是才开始``不要笑话哈`
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |