48. Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern, non-forager societies.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists’ strategy?
(A) All forager societies throughout history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other types of societies.
(B) Most ancient forager societies either dissolved or made a transition to another way of life.
(C) All anthropologists study one kind or another of modern-day society.
(D) Many anthropologists who study modern-day forager societies do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies.
(E) Even those modern-day forager societies that have not had significant contact with modern societies are importantly different from ancient forager societies.
答案是A没问题，但是OG对E的解释是strengthen，不明白，请哪位NN分析一下~！
Strengthen了Criticism
------------
文中的 Criticism：
学者所熟悉的（就是说所研究的）这些当今的 F 社会都跟其它当今非 F 社会都有接触（理解为：这种接触使这些当今 F 社会与古代 F 社会不同），所以研究这些当今 F 社会不能知道古代 F 社会是什么样子
------------
E：
除了这些学者熟悉的当今 F 社会 （即这些可能由于接触当今非 F 社会而与古代 F 社会不同的当今 F 社会）以外，其他的没有跟当今非 F 社会接触的当今 F 社会也已经跟古代 F 社会有了很大不同，所以当然加强批评了。
------------
------------
例子：
想知道古代中国人的意识形态
选现在比较深山老林的地区研究，以为这些地区的人的意识形态经历千百年没有什么变化
批评说：这些地区的人已经很多都在天天看 CNN， 所以不可能由他们的思想推出古中国人的思想
E：这些地区的人里没有 Dish Network 和 DirecTV 的人也已经跟古中国人的思想有很大差异（言外之意，更不要说那些已经私自安小锅还没被抓的看 CNN 之人了）
所以 E 加强了批评
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |