ChaseDream

标题: 问一下og10th 79 [打印本页]

作者: alohabrian    时间: 2009-1-20 17:15
标题: 问一下og10th 79
When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked
whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply,"No." Some theorists
try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized
subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is
dissociated from the part that replies.
Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?
(A)Why does the part that replies not answer,"Yes"?
(B)why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?
(C)Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist's suggestion that they are deaf?
(D)Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?
(E)Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?
答案是A

如果选A,那么就是说回答者应该说YES,可是为什么回答YES就能证明原文的解释呢?

有人说,回答YES就说明reply part 可以听见,而其他部分听不听见不知道。符合原文。

我感到奇怪,reply part不就是你的嘴吗?你的嘴在被催眠以后就能听见了?这是什么逻辑?

我认为听见hypnotist 的永远是耳朵,也就是说不过回答什么,只要回答了就说明 原文解释有问题,回答了yes也有问题。

应该质疑被催眠者为什么能听见而不是为什么说的是no,而不是yes。

请大家解答我的困惑。






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3