ChaseDream

标题: FeiFei-107 [打印本页]

作者: zjw007 时间: 2004-2-9 17:42
标题: FeiFei-107
107. Because of the recent transformation of the market, Quore, Inc., must increase the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.
If the statements above are true, which one of the following must on the basis of them also be true?
(A) It is only Quore’s production structure that makes it possible for Quore to survive the transformation of the market.
(B) Quore will not go bankrupt if it achieves a productivity increase of 20 percent over the next two years.
(C) If the market had not been transformed, Quore would have required no productivity increase in order to avoid bankruptcy.
(D) Because of the transformation of the market, Quore will achieve a productivity increase of 10 percent over the next two years.
(E) If a 20 percent productivity increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt.

y E? anybody can tell? Thanks!

作者: jediming 时间: 2004-2-9 18:41
feifei这道题目的题干有问题，正确的题干如下：

Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, Inc., must increase productivity, 10 percent over the course of the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.

作者: echo_bsc 时间: 2004-2-13 16:05
我觉得这道题在考察原命题和逆否命题的关系。原文中的条件是 not go bankrupt-->10% increase-->20% increase, 所以，可以推出 not 20%--->go bankrup, E is correct

作者: Elen 时间: 2004-4-3 03:32
I agree with echo_bsc's analysis.

作者: wangdaya 时间: 2004-4-21 23:38

以下是引用echo_bsc在2004-2-13 16:05:00的发言：
我觉得这道题在考察原命题和逆否命题的关系。原文中的条件是 not go bankrupt-->10% increase-->20% increase, 所以，可以推出 not 20%--->go bankrup, E is correct

完全有道理，B 恰恰将必要和充分条件混淆。故错！

作者: tony6 时间: 2004-8-12 15:36

以下是引用jediming在2004-2-9 18:41:00的发言：
feifei这道题目的题干有问题，正确的题干如下：

Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, Inc., must increase productivity, 10 percent over the course of the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.

非常感谢jediming。能不能请问题目的出处，谢谢。

作者: superstar 时间: 2004-10-13 17:25

谢谢，果然是CBSF的。

作者: wingkim 时间: 2005-8-27 22:03
大家都不细心，原文中的条件是 not go bankrupt-->10% productivity increase-->20% increase, 所以，可以推出 not 20%--->go bankrup。10％与20％ increase 的东西是不一样的，20％ increase 估计是指收入或营业额之类的指标。E选项20％productivity increase is unattainable for Quore,指的是productivity,而且甚至没有了时间限制“of the next two years,”。所以，我认为E选项应改为“If a 20 percent （删去productivity） increase is unattainable for Quore in the next two years, then it must go bankrupt. ”才符合各位大虾的推理A->B,B->C,then A->C,so notC->notA.

作者: vendetta 时间: 2005-8-30 19:06

加不加“两年内”限不限制时间其实都一个意思的，楼上考虑到了两年后公司存亡，但问题是两年后公司若要继续经营则首先必须以两年内20%的增幅为必要条件，何况两年内20%的增幅并不能保证两年后公司继续经营。因此个人认为选项E并不失严谨的。

作者: xiaoda 时间: 2008-7-4 14:26
up

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)