ChaseDream

标题: OG180，请教！ [打印本页]

作者: kid 时间: 2004-2-7 19:09
标题: OG180，请教！
180. Quasars are so distant that their light has taken billions of years to reach the Earth; consequently, we see them as they were during the formation of the universe.
(A) we see them as they were during
(B) we see them as they had been during
(C) we see them as if during
(D) they appear to us as they did in
(E) they appear to us as though in
the answer is A
看了og的解释，还是不很清楚，这里为什么要用一般过去时？（they were during）.为什么不可以用现在一般时？
不能用they appear是否因为这样就荒谬地说：星星自己跑到我们面前来，星星成了动作地发出者？
多谢多谢！

作者: 橙子 时间: 2004-2-7 19:39
不是they appear的错,而是they appear to us as they did (=they appeared to us) in the formation of the universe.
这些类星体形成可是几十亿年前呀,那时侯有人吗???
既然是几十亿年前,当然用过去时了.

作者: ford424 时间: 2005-3-1 22:56

刚刚查字典，appear不及物，did可以直接仅仅指代appeared表示那个时候呈现的样子，那样的话d又为什么不对？！

谢谢大家！

作者: ford424 时间: 2005-3-2 22:33
自己顶!

作者: anyname 时间: 2005-3-3 13:11

以下是引用ford424在2005-3-1 22:56:00的发言：

刚刚查字典，appear不及物，did可以直接仅仅指代appeared表示那个时候呈现的样子，那样的话d又为什么不对？！

谢谢大家！

这与appear是不是不及物动词没有关系。than作连词用来比较时，就是把前后相连的两个句子相同的部分省去，不同的补出，有时加点助动词什么的避免歧义。也就是说，省掉的都是相同的。所以这里they appear to us as they did就等于they appear to us as they did (to us)。如果不是to us，而是to u$, 那就补成：they appear to us as they did to u$。

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-3-3 13:12:26编辑过]

作者: ford424 时间: 2005-3-3 19:57
总算明白了，感谢！

作者: icare1 时间: 2005-8-13 16:04
顶

作者: seasnow 时间: 2005-12-14 09:53

问一下，如果改成：

they appear to us as they were during

对吗？why？谢谢！

作者: goodwish 时间: 2005-12-20 23:43
我看对了

作者: seasnow 时间: 2005-12-23 07:34

自己再看一眼觉得可能还是we see them比较好，因为他们现在appear to us的我们又要好多年后才能看到，所以现在看到的只是我们看到的，并不是他们appear的。

作者: huangyh03 时间: 2007-11-1 12:49
感觉是谁看到谁似乎没什么差别，与本题没有什么关系

作者: yexiang2007 时间: 2007-11-1 14:08
同意楼上的意见。

作者: yexiang2007 时间: 2007-11-1 14:11
错了我同意10楼的意见，而不是11楼的意见，appear和see是两回事

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)