作者: nelliefly 时间: 2008-12-24 20:20
两个都好羡慕...不如你开个帖子介绍你是如何拿到这两个offer的作者: 张楠 时间: 2008-12-25 00:07
ATK吧，估计lz有着比较好的background和潜质，如果去pg的话，发展的速度真的可能会慢一些。ATK的口碑，其实也还算不错了，虽然不是tier 1的。作者: oasissu 时间: 2008-12-30 14:07
我有个好朋友就是在PG工作后转去ATK的，发展很好。我想，有PG的工作经验将使你终身受用。作者: leoke 时间: 2009-1-1 23:06
PG 又是你．．作者: movingbear 时间: 2009-1-10 17:26
BA学不到太多作者: lictg 时间: 2009-1-28 01:01
AT is better! PG is not as professional as AT, it ultimately an industrial company.作者: muxiansheng 时间: 2009-1-30 19:52
It really depends on who you want to be. AT experience from the beginning would be a great plus on your professionalism and maturity of thinking style; on the other hand, if you really enjoy the process of going into marketing campaign details and see your idea have a big impact on the market, you probably would find P&G MKT very interesting.作者: MCinChina 时间: 2009-3-13 11:17
P&G marketing is the best place for gratuates to learn how to do marketing and build brand. if you just want to be Consultant, don't recommend you joining in P&G. but if you are interesting in marketing, P&G is the best. if you can be promoted as brand manager to lead one single brand covering advertising, public relation, launch event, roadshow, channel within 3 years, you can be named as master of marketing. but it is not easy.作者: tyl123 时间: 2009-3-23 12:16
楼主大牛啊~~~~