ChaseDream

标题: 再讨论OG-129，昏昏昏。请NN指点。 [打印本页]

作者: snow_mountain 时间: 2004-2-6 11:06
标题: 再讨论OG-129，昏昏昏。请NN指点。
129. In an effort to reduce their inventories, Italian vintners have cut prices; their wines have been priced to sell. and they are.

(A)    have been priced to sell, and they are
(B)    are priced to sell, and they have
(C)    are priced to sell, and they do
(D)    are being priced to sell, and have
(E)    had been priced to sell, and they have

看过以前的OG总结，还有一个问题。

答案中的they 指什么呀？如果指wines 好像比较说的过去。但是，前面的their 明明就是指vinters 呀。这里不是违反了指代一致的原则嘛？

还有省略的原则究竟是什么呀？为什么OG解释说，省略的是sell, 而不是priced to sell 呢？如何判断哪个词被省略了？

答案C。

作者: hru 时间: 2004-2-6 15:24
i think that what ETS want us to solve in the question is about tense. So you can look at choice a&b&d&e again.

in (A), have been priced to sell, and they are(前面现在完成时, 省略的是一般现在时）
in (B) are priced to sell, and they have（前面一般现在时, 省略的是现在完成时)
in (D) are being priced to sell, and have (前面现在进行时,省略的是现在完成时)
in (E) had been priced to sell, and they have（前面过去完成时, 省略的是现在完成时)

only in (C) are priced to sell, and they do, 前后两个时态都是一般现在时, match.

作者: hru 时间: 2004-2-6 15:36
btw, 省略的原则是前后一致.

作者: snow_mountain 时间: 2004-2-6 17:31
非常感谢。

作者: 蓝夕叶子 时间: 2005-5-23 23:42

答案中的they 指什么呀？如果指wines 好像比较说的过去。但是，前面的their 明明就是指vinters 呀。这里不是违反了指代一致的原则嘛？

同雪山姐姐的问题。好像还没有得到解答：（

请指教。谢谢

作者: Avantasia 时间: 2005-5-24 08:44

同一句话里面代词的指代应该是相同的，这点相信ETS不敢自己又打自己一巴掌。

句子逻辑：酒商要减少库存，那么他们想的办法就是定价销售，结果酒商确实卖的不错。

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-5-24 12:10:02编辑过]

作者: violetyang83 时间: 2005-5-24 11:55
they 和 their 在指代上可以不一样，我在一道OG的提干中看见过，一直对这个影响深刻。

作者: Avantasia 时间: 2005-5-24 12:11
violetyang83可以把例子贴出来吗，感谢！

作者: yangsh 时间: 2005-5-24 12:20

按照答案c，完整的表达应当是

In an effort to reduce their inventories, Italian vintners have cut prices; their wines have been priced to sell. and they (do) reduce their inventories.

作者: 蓝夕叶子 时间: 2005-5-24 12:58

谢谢大家的指点！！

明白了！！

btw，violetyang83可以贴出你的例子吗？

谢谢

作者: violetyang83 时间: 2005-5-24 21:26

60. According to a recent poll, owning and living in a freestanding house on its own land is still a goal of a majority of young adults, like that of earlier generations.

(A) like that of earlier generations

(B) as that for earlier generations

(C) just as earlier generations did

(D) as have earlier generations

(E) as it was of earlier generations

The intended comparison should be completed by a clause beginning with as and containing a subject and verb that correspond to the subject and verb of the main clause. In E, the best choice, it refers unambiguously to the phrasal subject owning ... land, the verb was corresponds to is, and today's young adults are appropriately compared to earlier generations(大并列). Choices A and B lack a verb corresponding to is and a clear referent for that (that 指a goal or a majority 不是很清楚). Choices C and D are confusing and illogical because their verbs, did and have, cannot substitute for is in the main clause.

its 指代的是a majority of young adults 后面的it指代的是owning and living in a freestanding house on its own land 。

呵呵，不知道对不对？

open for discussing~~

作者: goodwish 时间: 2005-5-24 22:06

I think its refers to house rather than a majority of young adults, while logically I am not so sure:-(

作者: 蓝夕叶子 时间: 2005-5-25 06:23

我都没有注意到这点。

那么是不是还应该讨论代词指代？

本来，ETS自己说的，it指代一个句子就是一个东东。那么。。怎么出现这么多不一样的。

翻以前的帖子去了

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-5-25 6:24:47编辑过]

作者: Avantasia 时间: 2005-5-25 12:14

这个以前有过讨论,可以找一下.

相同的代词在不同分句中指代可以不同.

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)