ChaseDream

标题: 难据分析 [打印本页]

作者: Snazzy    时间: 2004-2-5 00:37
标题: 难据分析
34.    Only when a system possesses natural or artificial boundaries that associate the water within it the hydrologic cycle may the entire system properly be termed hydrogeologic.

what's 'it' for here?  and  'within'? thanks
作者: carawayt    时间: 2004-2-5 09:53
within it应该指的是wihin the hydrologic cycle吧?

不知对不对?
作者: dawnroad    时间: 2004-2-7 11:08
以下是引用Snazzy在2004-2-5 0:37:00的发言:
34. Only when a system possesses natural or artificial boundaries that associate the water within it the hydrologic cycle may the entire system properly be termed hydrogeologic.

what's 'it' for here?  and  'within'? thanks


这段话中少打了一个with,所以造成大家理解困难
that associate the water within it with the hydrologic cycle
主干:associate the water with the hydrologic cycle
这样 it 就清楚了,指的是a system
within it 修饰the water
作者: Snazzy    时间: 2004-2-11 00:03
agreed.

here is another one:

63.    Granted that the presence of these elements need not argue an authorial awareness of novelistic construction comparable to that of Henry James, their presence does encourage attempts to unify the novel’s heterogeneous parts

'that', i think, should refer to 'novelistic construction', but the chinese translation confused me. what do u think
作者: bon    时间: 2004-2-11 10:29
I think it should be "awareness of novelistic construction"
作者: 雪落无声    时间: 2004-2-18 19:50
以下是引用bon在2004-2-11 10:29:00的发言:
I    think    it    should    be    "awareness    of    novelistic    construction"
agree,awareness是A of B 的中心词

作者: Snazzy    时间: 2004-3-1 00:11


81、 The
broad language of the amendment strongly suggests that its framers were
proposing to write into the Constitution not a laundry list of specific     civil rights but a principle of equal
citizenship that forbids organized society from treating any individual as a
member of an inferior class.






-----> this is the explanation:




The broad language of the mendment strongly
suggests that its framers were proposing to write not a laundry list of
specific civil rights but a principle of equal citizenship that forbids
organized society from treating any individuall as a member of an inferior
class into the Constitution.




-------> here after is my version:




The broad language of the mendment strongly
suggests that its framers were proposing to write not a laundry list of
specific civil rights but a principle of equal citizenship into the Constitution
that forbids
organized society from treating any individuall as a member of an inferior
class.










欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3