ChaseDream
标题: [求助]大全254 [打印本页]
作者: dreadpower 时间: 2004-2-3 21:37
标题: [求助]大全254
254.Dr. Sayre’s lecture recounted several little-known episodes in the relations between nations that illustrates what is wrong with alliances and treaties that do not have popular support.
(A) relations between nations that illustrates
(B) relation of one nation with another that illustrates
(C) relations between nations that illustrate
(D) relation of one nation with another and illustrate
(E) relations of nations that illustrates
答案先不说,各位能告诉我,你们选什么,理由是什么吗???
作者: ecsniffer 时间: 2004-2-3 21:43
B。
主干是lecture reccounted episodes in the relation (that illustrates----)
作者: dreadpower 时间: 2004-2-3 22:07
我也选B,我是通过alliances and treaties 并列来排除选项的,
我看还是我不能体会句子意思导致的,这个句子到底什么意思??请ecsniffer MM指教
BTW:MM现在有没有下决心再考了?时间我觉得你很充裕啊,研三考也没什么不好啊关键是PHD or MBA ??
作者: ecsniffer 时间: 2004-2-3 22:25
Dr. Sayre’s lecture recounted several little-known episodes in the relation of one nation with another that illustrates what is wrong with alliances and treaties that do not have popular support.
意思是Dr. Sayre 的讲座叙述了几个不出名的时期一国与别国之间的关系,这种关系表明了没有获得广泛支持的联盟和合约的问题在哪里。
不好意思,翻译的好烂。
这里的of one nation with another修饰relation。
而that illustrates what is wrong with alliances and treaties 修饰relation
do not have popular support修饰alliances and treaties
我已经下决心重考了,复习从昨天开始。。。
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=34&ID=35815多多光顾呀
我只是还没定下来考试的时间,因为不清楚能否同时应付tofel和gmat。
phd是不读了,还是工作两三年念个mba好些。
dreadpower,具体的如果你有兴趣知道,把你的email地址告诉我,发封早上写的东西给你。
作者: dreadpower 时间: 2004-2-3 22:30
我也是烦考试时间啊,在三月,五月摇摆,事情太多了~~~~
我也想读MBA,8过,你的条件比我好,我这个研究生读完,只能搞研究,工作经历对我而言,是非常头疼的事情~~~~前途茫茫啊
dreadpower(在) sohu.com
MSN:xufeng80522 (8过偶不怎么用这个,学校里只能上国内~~~~惨ing)
忘了说一句:如果你读MBA,现在考T没用吧,你还有一年毕业呢,MBA怎么也要2-3年的工作经历吧,还要能做出东西。我觉得你GMAT应该3年级考,这样可申请的时间要多点,毕竟好多学校不希望你的G放很长时间,越新鲜越好。至于T应该是准备申请前考。这样安排时间合理。现在放弃T,攻G。一点个人意见而已
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-2-3 22:41:17编辑过]
作者: ecsniffer 时间: 2004-2-3 23:05
嗯,文章发到你邮箱了
我只会用email地址加MSN,不好意思。
还是你加我的吧,ecsniffer(A) hotmail.com
不过如果你上MSN不方便,就算了。EMAIL已经很便捷了。。。
作者: dreadpower 时间: 2004-2-3 23:26
episodes in the relation 还是不能理解~~~~~~~~~
作者: 2love2live 时间: 2004-2-3 23:42
以下是引用dreadpower在2004-2-3 22:07:00的发言:
我也选B,我是通过alliances and treaties 并列来排除选项的,
对不起,这句不会做,请问如何排除?谢谢
E 为什么不对?
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-2-3 23:43:28编辑过]
作者: ecsniffer 时间: 2004-2-3 23:43
朗文中
in有一个意思:
used to say what specific thing your statement is related to
Milk is very rich in calcium.
Clark had become more extreme in his opinions.
an increase in fuel prices
The street is about a mile in length.
我觉得这里的in就是这个意思,不知道能不能接受?
作者: dreadpower 时间: 2004-2-4 10:52
以下是引用2love2live在2004-2-3 23:42:00的发言: 对不起,这句不会做,请问如何排除?谢谢
E 为什么不对?
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-2-3 23:43:28编辑过]
如果alliances and treaties 并列,那么A,C排除,between。。。and用法不成立
that肯定修饰relation,不可能修饰nation,所以排除D,E,主谓一致
作者: flora_wang 时间: 2004-2-21 06:14
以下是引用dreadpower在2004-2-4 10:52:00的发言:以下是引用2love2live在2004-2-3 23:42:00的发言:
对不起,这句不会做,请问如何排除?谢谢
E 为什么不对?
如果alliances
and
treaties
并列,那么A,C排除,between。。。and用法不成立
that肯定修饰relation,不可能修饰nation,所以排除D,E,主谓一致
为什么就能排除a,c,呐???alliances and treaties可以是多个国家或政府之间的啊???想不通...字典上特地写了:
relations (phfu复数)relations: official connections between companies, countries, etc......
zenm怎么看都是c啊,虽然我看过答案了...
作者: Snazzy 时间: 2004-2-28 08:38
标题: 大全 243
1, I agree. 'relations' has nothing wrong:
relations [plural]
a) official connections between countries, companies, organizations etc
Relations between the two countries have improved recently.
2. I am highly skeptical of the usage of 'relation of A withB'. does anybody have an example?
relation between
the relation between prices and wages
The price the meat is sold for bears no relation to (=is not connected to) the price the farmer receives.
3, why is C wrong?
作者: ecsniffer 时间: 2004-2-28 19:17
c illustrate紧随nations之后,会造成illustrate修饰nations的错觉,实际上应该修饰relations
作者: liaijun_2001 时间: 2005-11-9 10:18
B有一个明显的逻辑错误,relation illustrate肯定不如episode illustrate更合逻辑
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |