The following appeared as part of an article in the local newspaper:
"Our factory in Cookville is our most advanced and efficient. It is capable of producing ten drill bits for each of production costs, whereas none of our other factories can produce more than seven drill bits per dollar of production costs. Therefore, we can reduce our overall drill bit production by devoting the Cookville factory entirely to drill bit production. Since reducing the production costs of individual machine parts is the only way to achieve our larger goal of reducing our overall production costs, dedicating the Cookville factory entirely to drill bit production and shifting all other machine part machine to our other factories will help us to attain that larger goal."
想到一点...考虑到生产的相对优势，虽然说Cookville产drill bit比其他厂节约成本，但有可能Cookville生产的其他东西（如CCC）成本更节约，效率更高，如果devoting the Cookville factory entirely to drill bit production而让其他厂生产CCC，总体成本可能不减反增。
请指教...
因为是新人,很多方面都不是很懂,英语也很差,但还是要鼓足勇气在这里发一帖,希望大家多多指教,我也在准备考G,刚开始还不到一周,也恳请大家予以指点迷津,让小弟在考G的路上少走点歪路.
文中有提到Cookville是最先进也是效率最高的工厂，集中全力让Cookville生产drilling bits是在发挥Cookville的本身优势，也不失是一个很好的选择。但是为什么Cookville相比其他工厂先进而且高效呢？是不是因为Cookville有优秀的人才，先进的生产工艺和设备，良好的物料，优越的生产环境或者是合理的生产法规呢？如果是，问题就可以通过Cookville的优点展开了。宏观上来讲，通过降低各零件的成本以求降低总的生产成本从而达到最终目标，但微观上面讲各个生产环节工艺的控制对总的生产成本的降低是更加地具有说服力。
另一方面，从市场来讲，drilling bits的需求量是灵活变动的，供求关系并非固定不变，多个工厂的存在对生产的可调控性是有一定的影响，这个系统会有更大的张力来适应各种供求关系和市场的不定期定量的变化。对driling bit这种产品来讲，在工艺上的创新对市场的影响是非常大的，而几个工厂的并存对于工艺创新和改进是有利的因素。
然而，文中又有提到
“shifting all other machine part machine to our other factories”
其实这样就造成了生产的脱节，单从生产drilling bits这个产品来讲（如果没有理解错的话driling bits应该是钻头），整个生产工艺流程的控制是可以在人力能够达到的范围内的。我把上面这句话理解成为是将所有的机加工的零件都转移到其他公司，从而引申Cookville只做前期和后期的工作。我并未理解这几个工厂的地理位置关系如何，光从这点分析的话生产过程的成本在各个环节的衔接上又无形地增加了。
控制生产成本个人认为关键是对一个生产过程的控制，像文中提到的如果只让Cookville一个公司来生产drilling bits降低零部件成本来控制生产成本的话，那就是忽略了整个系统的整体生产能力.在分析此文的时候，我认为更应该针对Cookville降低生产成本的决策入手,对公司现存的状况进以分析(猜测)，盘出Cookville和其他工厂的对比，将其一分为二,取主要矛盾,对生产过程控制和运行方式进行探讨。
楼上太强悍。。 以至于我有点没看懂。。
太差劲了哈哈
如果从有形成本和无形成本考虑可能会更直接一点.
属于胡乱分析,各位见笑了.
Labour cost: might be different machine, different skill set, Over time Pay etc.
Transition cost: transfer the product line from the other plants to Cookville.
Limited capacity: Cookville's machine has limited capacity in producing drill pits. Once the limit has been overpassed, there's no more room to improve overall production.
Cut other overhead costs: The article mentioned 'Since reducing the production costs of individual machine parts is the only way to achieve our larger goal of reducing our overall production costs' which is not right. i.e. Production costs = direct cost + indirect cost. Labor, rental costs are also attributed to product costs. Therefore we're able to improve the efficiency through mutliple cost cutting projects rather than simply boosting the machine operating hours.
Just my two cents. It could be more.
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |