标题: 一道逻辑题请教[求助] [打印本页] 作者: amo 时间: 2004-2-1 17:19 标题: 一道逻辑题请教[求助] 15(p67-13). The recent decline in the value of the dollar was triggered by a prediction of slower economic growth in the coming year. But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government's huge budget deficit, which must therefore be decreased to prevent future currency declines. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion about how to prevent future currency declines? (A) The government has made little attempt to reduce the budget deficit. (B) The budget deficit has not caused a slowdown in economic growth. (C) The value of the dollar declined several times in the year prior to the recent prediction of slower economic growth. (D) Before there was a large budget deficit, predictions of slower economic growth frequently caused declines in the dollar's value. (E) When there is a large budget deficit, other events in addition to predictions of slower economic growth sometimes trigger declines in currency value. 请问这题的逻辑结构是怎样的？是前提推结论还是因果关系？又如何来解答呢？谢谢作者: 番茄炒蛋 时间: 2004-2-1 17:45
答案是c吧 找出他因削弱，所以原文给出的理由就不成立咯 下次还是把答案写出来吧，新来的小兄弟，呵呵作者: amo 时间: 2004-2-1 19:14
答案是D，不过我觉得C也有道理作者: 番茄炒蛋 时间: 2004-2-1 20:02
我觉得还是c bronoy你再来看看吧，确认一下 我真的是糊涂了？ 作者: cranberry 时间: 2004-2-1 20:07
文章意思是：如果不是因为巨大的财政赤字，增长缓慢的预估一般不会对美圆造成不好的影响。 否定它只要说明，没有财政赤字，也能造成美圆贬值。
