ChaseDream
标题: [求助] GWD1-Q32-已爬文,但並沒有解答我的疑惑! [打印本页]
作者: ashleyyuan 时间: 2008-11-9 22:18
标题: [求助] GWD1-Q32-已爬文,但並沒有解答我的疑惑!
GWD1-Q32:
To develop more accurate population forecasts, demographers have to know a great deal more than now about the social and economic determinants of fertility.
- have to know a great deal more than now about the social and economic
- have to know a great deal more than they do now about the social and economical
- would have to know a great deal more than they do now about the social and economical
- would have to know a great deal more than they do now about the social and economic
- would have to know a great deal more than now about the social and economical
BCE可以淘汰。社會的跟經濟的正確用法應該是social and economic ….
但是我比較有疑惑的是在面對A跟D兩個答案時,在語態上為什麼不是選A而是選D? have to 跟 would have to 語氣上,後者有"應該必須..."的意思,可是,A的選項在文法判斷上並沒有明顯的問題呀?
煩請各位賜教.謝謝~~
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-11-9 22:19:03编辑过]
作者: jakelu 时间: 2008-11-10 11:41
A的问题在于more than now
作者: Jericho_007 时间: 2008-11-10 12:54
同意楼上的意见.A的问题在于more than now比较对象不清晰,是错误的。显然D中more than they do now 指代清楚。
作者: ashleyyuan 时间: 2008-11-10 14:08
恩 謝謝兩位了~~~
作者: larryhsing 时间: 2009-8-10 10:37
那么单纯考虑have to 和would have to,他们在意义表达上有什么区别呢~~请nn指点~~
作者: dalphia 时间: 2009-8-10 11:06
would have to和have to的区别主要在意思上,除了时态要求和某些固定句型(eg. ‘if + 过去时, ...would...’)的规定外可以说是仁者见仁,智者见智,建议去区分其他更硬性的考点
作者: shyphynana 时间: 2009-10-21 23:45
嗯,记住“社会和经济的“是social and economic”。。。。。。。
thanks
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |