ChaseDream

标题: GWD1-Q16与LZM9-3,请解惑 [打印本页]

作者: vvzhong    时间: 2008-11-6 21:38
标题: GWD1-Q16与LZM9-3,请解惑

    

GWD1-Q16B)


    

Soaring television costs

accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992,a
greater proportion than it was in any previous election.   


    

A. a
greater proportion than it was


    

B. a greater
proportion than


    

C. a
greater proportion than they have been


    

D. which is
greater than was so


    

E. which is
greater than it has been


    

LZM9-3(C)


    

    A large rise in the
number of housing starts in the coming year should boost new construction dollars
by several billion dollars, making the construction industry’s economic health
much more robust than five years ago.


    

(A) making the construction industry’s
economic health much more robust than five years ago.


    

(C) making the construction industry’s
economic health much more robust than it was five years ago.


    

LZM:说than之前的the construction industry’s economic healthfive
years ago
比较不对应。那GWD1-Q16a
greater proportion
in any previous election对应么?该如何理解?谢谢


    

 


    
 


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-11-6 21:45:21编辑过]

作者: vvzhong    时间: 2008-11-6 21:53
不好意思,调整了半天还是不会调整格式,大家见谅了,谢谢。我其实想知道如何判断比较对象,than之后什么时候应该将谓语补出。

作者: zhaodawei    时间: 2008-11-7 00:03

补全最好,不补也不错。

Soaring television costs  accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992,a greater proportion than they did in any previous election.  


作者: ashleyyuan    时间: 2008-11-9 12:19
标题: 回复:(zhaodawei)补全最好,不补也不错。Soaring t...

A錯在it was,可省略it was.不簡潔


    

C錯在題目是比例相互比較,而不是主詞costs的比較. 後者主詞型態不對,且時態也不對,造成語意改變。


    DE錯在which
先行詞不應該是1992.合理的語意應該是費用比例跟之前選舉的費用比例做比較
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-11-9 12:20:09编辑过]

作者: elaine1031    时间: 2009-7-16 13:29
up
作者: e_shu    时间: 2009-7-20 08:42
o




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3