ChaseDream

标题: [讨论]再问GWD 24-38 (TTGWD4-Q14） [打印本页]

作者: 混乱思维 时间: 2008-11-6 08:55
标题: [讨论]再问GWD 24-38 (TTGWD4-Q14）

Which of the flowing most logically completes the argument?

The attribution of the choral work Lacrimae to the composer Pescard (1400 – 1474) has been regarded as tentative, since it was based on a single treatise from the early 1500’s that named Pescard as the composer. Recently, several musical treatises from the late 1500’s have come to light, all of which name Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae. Unfortunately, these newly discovered treatises lend no support to the attribution of Lacrimae to Pescard, since _______.

A. the treatise from the early 1500’s misidentifies the composers of some of the musical works it considers

B. the author of the treatise from the early 1500’s had no very strong evidence on which to base the identification of Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae

C. there are works that can conclusively be attributed to Pescard that are not even mentioned in the treatise from the early 1500’s

D. the later treatises probably had no source for their attribution other than the earlier treatise

E. no known treatises from the 1600’s identify Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae

答案是D.

我好像连题在说什么都没有读懂，好郁闷

作者: fenfen1987 时间: 2008-11-6 10:26

题目的意思就是说这个作品
Lacrimae 本来以为是 Pescard 写的。这个结论是基于一个a single treatise 上的，所以一般认为只是tentative。

最近呢，又发现了several musical treatises from the late 1500’s ，这些都表明Lacrimae 本来以为是 Pescard 写的。

题目问的是为什么这个发现没有支持上面的这个结论。

D的意思就是说因为
后来的several musical treatises from the late 1500’s 的来源与一开始的a single treatise 的来源是一样的，所以这个并不能对原来的结论又支持的作用，只是单纯的重复而已。

Hope it helps~~~~

作者: 混乱思维 时间: 2008-11-11 07:55

豁然开朗，MM你好牛呀，多谢！

还是老喽，要是脑子能象你这样灵光，估计就能考个好成绩了。

作者: freesoul 时间: 2009-4-17 14:02

以前的一个东东说是P写得，只有一个证据，略显不足。

后来发现了几个证据，以为可以充分证明了。

没想到，还是不充分啊？为什么呢：

因为后来的这个也是基于以前的那个证据为依据来源的。。。

（以一个还在被怀疑的证据为依据来源，来做自己的依据，这就类似“伪证的循环”了，当然不行。）

作者: fiona_hq 时间: 2009-7-26 12:39

作者: caoqin1981 时间: 2011-9-26 09:59
大家讨论的不错，学习了，伪证的循环，还有就是D中的

句型no...other than X，正是X....,

例句I had no choice other than that 除此之外我别无选择

作者: Aquariusmm89 时间: 2011-11-9 19:12
up~明白了！

作者: jay871750293 时间: 2012-4-11 11:25
谢谢大家！！！

明白鸟~~~

作者: joshuajoshine 时间: 2012-6-1 17:40
标题: 楼上说的有道理，最主要是no...other than X得理解

补充一下：

句型no Y other than X，意思是：Y 只是X....,

例句I had no choice other than that 选择只有那个

同样理解选项：D.[font=]the later treatises probably had no source for their attribution other than the earlier treatise
后面专著的来源只是前面的那个专著（相当于我们以前写论文是参考文献用）

作者: girasol0821 时间: 2012-7-28 20:00
UPUP!懂了~谢谢大家~

作者: fantasy198 时间: 2012-7-30 21:17
mark 。伪循环证明。

作者: lesley0927 时间: 2013-5-25 02:36
谢谢大家，终于看懂了

作者: fleur0323 时间: 2013-11-5 12:10
豁然开朗谢谢大家

作者: zzloveyibo 时间: 2014-4-7 20:26
终于懂了。。。。

再加个知识点吧，

其实文中的tentative等价于treatises lend no support to the attribution of Lacrimae to Pescard.

作者: 林昭苏 时间: 2016-7-10 20:26
感谢分享！

作者: Grace828 时间: 2016-11-25 20:18
感谢分享！

作者: Yulie_r 时间: 2020-9-18 16:37
感谢分享！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)