5. When
limitations were in effect on nuclear-arms testing, people tended to save more of their money,
but when nuclear-arms testing increased, people tended to spend more of their
money. The perceived threat of nuclear catastrophe, therefore, decreases the willingness
of people to postpone consumption for the sake of saving money.
The argument above assumes that
(A) the
perceived threat of nuclear catastrophe has increased over the years
(B) most people
supported the development of nuclear arms
(C) people’s
perception of the threat of nuclear catastrophe depends on the amount of
nuclear-arms testing being done
(D) the
people who saved the most money when nuclear-arms testing was limited were the
ones who supported such limitations
(E) there are
more consumer goods available when nuclear-arms testing increases
答案是c 和the amount of
nuclear-arms testing being done有和关系``一看就感觉是out of scope 就排除了
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |