ChaseDream

标题: [求助]请教关于分词和从句做定语跳跃修饰的问题 [打印本页]

作者: 5m21 时间: 2008-10-27 06:02
标题: [求助]请教关于分词和从句做定语跳跃修饰的问题

从白勇的书上看到一题，P182 Q58

Originally developed for detecting air polluants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medincine, archaeology, and criminology.

选项E. A technique that was originally developed for detecting air polluants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements quickly in almost any substance and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-ray emissionm,

答案选A

书上给出E错的原因是called for...与 a technique 相隔太远，所以只能就近修饰substance，导致修饰关系不合理。

可是原句里的 ,which can quickly... 定语从句离technique也有一段距离啊，这就不算远了？不会去修饰emission了？

E到底是因为书上给的原因错了还是因为 and without 才错的？

还有说这里就应该用can 而不用have the ability to.. 可是这里明明是technique有能力来干这些事的啊，为什么要用can?

最后请教下到分词短语，that从句，which从句到底都什么时候可以跳跃修饰什么时候只能就近修饰呢？

作者: 5m21 时间: 2008-10-29 07:20
帮帮忙吧。。

作者: soyabo 时间: 2008-10-29 10:11

如果我来做，我会排除E的，可能理由不充分哈~

E：“and without v-ing”好奇怪

A: "which"就近指代一定没错，但“，which”（注意有无comma）可以越前指代也可以就近指代~（貌似见过）

关于which指代的讨论至今没定论啊~头疼

作者: 5m21 时间: 2008-10-29 10:27

多谢，看的时候没注意到and without doing

新东方我记的笔记有句话 ‘ ，which 可以向前跳跃几个词指代，但跳跃过多一定错’ 当时比较傻什么都不懂，现在发现好像也是乱说

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)