ChaseDream

标题: LSAT 97-02-1-14 [打印本页]

作者: fostercao    时间: 2008-10-20 15:23
标题: LSAT 97-02-1-14

In jurisdictions where use of headlights is optional when visibility is good, drivers who use headlights at all times are less likely to be involved in a collision than are drivers whose use headlights only when visibility is poor. Yet Hightway Safety Department records show that making use of headlights mandatory at all times does nothing to reduce the overall number of collisions.

which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy in the information above?

(C)only very careful drivers use headlights when their use is not legally required.

this is the correct answer?   Can someone explain why ? Thanks!


作者: sevfye    时间: 2008-11-28 04:55

没有法律规定的时候,只有careful driver开灯.即事故降低的原因都归于这些人.

有法律规定的时候, 除了careful driver还加上 uncareful driver开灯.但是后者并不对事故降低有影响.所以有没有法律规定,效果是一样的.


作者: crusoecrusoe    时间: 2009-3-9 12:23
本题旨在找一个论据(事实)证明结论(does nothing to reduce collisions),而这个事实,就是那些有没有法律规定,都不认真开车而导致事故的人。
作者: kbsred    时间: 2009-5-29 14:24
请问哪里有97-02的试题?




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3