aeoluseros 发表于 2008-10-22 10:13
恩，不是还有主谓一起比较，状语比较等等吗？所有的句子成分都可以拿来比，这里就是主谓的比较吧。umm...GW ...
GWD26-Q28
Traffic safety officials predict that drivers will
be equally likely to exceed the proposed speed limit as the current one.
A. equally likely to exceed the proposed speed
limit as
B. equally likely to exceed the proposed speed limit as they are
C. equally likely that they will exceed the proposed
speed limit as
D. as likely that they will exceed the proposed
speed limit as
E. as likely to exceed the proposed speed limit
as they are
此题答案为E，没有问题，they are 后面省略了likely to exceed , 补全后为 they are likely to exceed the current one
但是回头一想，这里是什么比较呢？如果是宾语比较，the proposed speed limit 和 the current one比较的话，为什么还要加they are，可否直接写成：
Traffic safety officials predict that drivers will
be as likely to exceed the proposed speed limit
as the current one.？？？？？？？？？这里不是很清楚
而且加了they are是属于什么比较呢？可能性比较？
常见的比较：主语比较、宾语比较、介宾比较、状语比较、一个事物的前后比较
这里的比较好象都不是上面几种，那是什么呢？
they are是应该补出的。
momo...属于那种比较没有总结过，但是不补全they are是会产生歧义的
they are是应该补出的。
momo...属于那种比较没有总结过，但是不补全they are是会产生歧义的
省略they are后：
Traffic safety officials predict that drivers will
be as likely to exceed the proposed speed limit
as the current one.
没有are啊，are和exceed歧义怎么讲？
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=103101&replyID=&skin=1
这里有比较的分类
搜几个句子拿来研究下
（1）Women are now as likely to use the Internet as men
（2）He's as likely to fight us as the Trojans.他和特洛伊人一样想和我们作战。
（3）IT people are twice as likely to wear heavy metal t-shirt as other people
都为主语之间的比较，之所以第二个as后面不加 are 或者 is 是因为be动词后面没有宾语，不构成主谓宾比较，看成是主谓比较，不用重复动词
注意这里不会引起歧义，拿第一个句子说，不会引起use the Internet 和 use the men的歧义
回到本题，如果按我说的省略they are：
Traffic safety officials predict that drivers will
be as likely to exceed the proposed speed limit
as the current one.
其实也就是拿出Drivers will
be as likely to exceed the proposed speed limit
as the current one.来研究
歧义就在：Drivers will
be likely to exceed the proposed speed limit 和The current one will
be as likely to exceed the proposed speed limit 的可能性一样，也就是会被误认为是主语之间的比较
我觉得不太可能吧，宾语比较不是不用补出助动词的嘛，按照你的说法
宾语比较 A do C1 than C2 eg Rice has protein of higher quality than sugar（比较宾语）
岂不是也有可能又是跟A比、又是跟C1比，整个宾语比较就不是没法存在了吗？
请指教，谢谢！
这个问题问的好，我就是选了A
就拿LZ那个例子：（2）He's as likely to fight us as the Trojans.他和特洛伊人一样想和我们作战。
这个是他和特洛伊人比，主语比，如果句子要让我们和特洛伊人比呢？就是说他打我们和他打特洛伊人的可能性一样。不应该是He's as likely to fight us as the Trojans? --> He's as likely to fight us as he is lightly to fight Trojans.
这题明显就是把proposed speed limit和current one比，就是宾语比较，何必要选E哪？那么繁琐？
这个问题问的好，我就是选了A
就拿LZ那个例子：（2）He's as likely to fight us as the Trojans.他和特洛伊人一样想和我们作战。
这个是他和特洛伊人比，主语比，如果句子要让我们和特洛伊人比呢？就是说他打我们和他打特洛伊人的可能性一样。不应该是He's as likely to fight us as the Trojans? --> He's as likely to fight us as he is lightly to fight Trojans.
这题明显就是把proposed speed limit和current one比，就是宾语比较，何必要选E哪？那么繁琐？
agree!
我觉得这里是状语的比较，所以要把主、谓、宾都补出，只是 likely to exceed 前后重复，出于简洁才省略。
要是连 they are 都省略了
会以为是 drivers are likely to exceed the proposed limit as the current one are likely to exceed the proposed limit
这样就逻辑错误了
aeoluseros 发表于 2008-10-22 10:13
恩，不是还有主谓一起比较，状语比较等等吗？所有的句子成分都可以拿来比，这里就是主谓的比较吧。umm...GW ...
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |
