ChaseDream

标题: 再问OG10 第8题 [打印本页]

作者: machaelsonic    时间: 2008-10-19 19:26
标题: 再问OG10 第8题

8. Lacking information about energy use, people tend to overestimate the amount of energy used by
equipment. such as lights, that are visible and must be turned on and off and underestimate that used by
unobtrusive equipment, such as water heaters.
(A) equipment, such as lights, that are visible and must be turned on and off and underestimate that
(B) equipment, such as lights, that are visible and must be turned on and off and underestimate it when
(C) equipment, such as lights, that is visible and must be turned on and off and underestimate it when
(D) visible equipment, such as lights, that must be turned on and off and underestimate that
(E) visible equipment, such as lights, that must be turned on and off and underestimate it when

答案是D, 新东方说that在gmat中不能引导非限制性定语从句必须紧紧跟着所修饰的对象,因此排除ABC, 可是D里不也是that与被修饰对象equipment分离吗? 为什么就正确了? 谢谢!


作者: guting109    时间: 2008-10-19 20:47
以下是引用machaelsonic在2008-10-19 19:26:00的发言:

8. Lacking information about energy use, people tend to overestimate the amount of energy used by
equipment. such as lights, that are visible and must be turned on and off and underestimate that used by
unobtrusive equipment, such as water heaters.
(A) equipment, such as lights, that are visible and must be turned on and off and underestimate that

equipment单数所以应该是 is visible 并且that are visible 这样用没有visible equipment简洁而且无法与后面的unobtrusive平行
(B) equipment, such as lights, that are visible and must be turned on and off and underestimate it when

同上 最后应该用that the amount of energy used by 与 that used by平行(that代表前面的the amount of)
(C) equipment, such as lights, that is visible and must be turned on and off and underestimate it when

that is visible 不简洁与后面单词不平行
(D) visible equipment, such as lights, that must be turned on and off and underestimate that


(E) visible equipment, such as lights, that must be turned on and off and underestimate it when

同C

答案是D, 新东方说that在gmat中不能引导非限制性定语从句必须紧紧跟着所修饰的对象,因此排除ABC, 可是D里不也是that与被修饰对象equipment分离吗? 为什么就正确了? 谢谢!

XDF的那个规律只是一个相对性的规律 

that引导的作为限定从句 是不能修饰插入语中的词的 而且逻辑上也说不过去~ 所以此处没有歧义~

希望能对LZ有帮助 菜鸟一个错误的地方请各位NN指正~






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3