ChaseDream

标题: [求助]GWD3-Q32，没人问过 [打印本页]

作者: 蓝露 时间: 2008-10-4 23:01
标题: [求助]GWD3-Q32，没人问过

GWD3-Q32:

Newspaper editorial:

In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.

B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.

C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.

D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.

E. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.

答案是C，为什么不选A啊？看不太懂答案，NN帮忙分析一下吧~~

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-10-6 0:44:04编辑过]

作者: dreamermm 时间: 2008-10-6 00:43
我觉得答案是C

作者: 蓝露 时间: 2008-10-6 00:45

就是C啊？偶不太明白诶~

A呢？C是设么意思呢？

作者: rock19840717 时间: 2008-10-6 16:09

题的意思就是说这个harsh推出的话，不能让那些罪犯（inmates）去获得一个college-level course违反了政府的最初的目的

原因他说了，因为那些获得这个college-level course的人在出狱后犯罪率要低inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates

C的假定就是说这些获得clc的人没有可能本身就是比较少容易犯罪的，言下之意就是说，是这些course产生作用了

作者: zjpopo 时间: 2008-10-6 16:43

你可以找stella的GWD分类下载来看。里面对于这题的分析很清楚。还有Lawyer的解释。

作者: 蓝露 时间: 2008-10-6 18:21

能给我提供个网址么？我搜不到~

谢谢啊！

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-10-6 18:20:47编辑过]

作者: zjpopo 时间: 2008-10-6 20:51

以下是引用蓝露在2008-10-6 18:21:00的发言：

能给我提供个网址么？我搜不到~

谢谢啊！

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&ID=188042&page=1先看看这个

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&ID=87758&page=1还有这个是总的，我就是在备考资料里找到的。

作者: zjpopo 时间: 2008-10-6 20:58

还有讨论帖在这里，你看看吧。

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&ID=58525

作者: 蓝露 时间: 2008-10-6 21:31
谢谢啊~

作者: Powellyao 时间: 2009-7-17 13:42
顶

作者: elaine1031 时间: 2009-7-17 20:22
up

作者: mysun08 时间: 2009-7-18 14:07

我来试着分析：

前提：being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

出狱后，上过college course的犯人比没上过的其他人总体犯罪少

结论：不给犯人上college course的行为与政府降低犯罪率的目的相抵触

Assumption: C 想选课的犯人（在上课之前）并不比其他人出狱后犯罪的可能性低；即要支持：上college course使这些犯人改变，而不是这些人本来就比比其他人出狱后犯罪的可能性低

我认为A不如C明确

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)