ChaseDream

标题: 向大虾们求教T-3-Q7 [打印本页]

作者: kevincorn    时间: 2008-9-17 16:22
标题: 向大虾们求教T-3-Q7
ffice:smarttags">ffice:smarttags">
    

In Scotland,
the number of wild salmon have been reduced because of uncontrolled deep-sea
and coastal netting
, by pollution, and by various other threats to the
fish’s habitat.


    
  1. number of wild salmon
         have been reduced because of uncontrolled deep-sea and coastal netting
  2. number of wild salmon
         is reduced because deep-sea and coastal netting is not controlled
  3. numbers of wild salmon
         has been reduced because of uncontrolled deep-sea and coastal netting
  4. wild salmon’s numbers
         are reduced by deep-sea and coastal netting that is not controlled
    

E.  wild salmon’s numbers have
been reduced by uncontrolled deep-sea and coastal netting.

这道题的答案E选项中的number用复数为何仍是正确的呢?另B错在哪里了?请各位nn指教~~~


作者: ybzs    时间: 2008-9-17 16:25
最后那么多by说明你前面的原因必须是by引导的状语从句,选because of/because加从句的先打自己一嘴巴
作者: kevincorn    时间: 2008-9-17 16:28
偶错了……没有看后面的句子就选了

只是不知为什么number在这里用复数是可以?

作者: kuaidao    时间: 2008-12-18 14:38

。。。的数量the number of + 复数名词作主语,谓语动词用单数形式;

大量的a number of + 复数名词作主语, 谓语动词用复数

an amount of + 不可数名词
        
谓语:单数

quantity of + 不可数名词
        
谓语:单数

numbers of 出现一定错

错因:平行


作者: 热带鱼    时间: 2008-12-18 15:01

    

number 表示数量amount的时候可以,可以用单数或复数,


    

不过the number of 后面谓语单数,
the numbers of 后面谓语复数


    

另外,a large number of 等于 large numbers of,并非说numbers of 出现一定错


    



作者: hairicanye    时间: 2009-3-4 17:08

。。。的数量the number of + 复数名词作主语,谓语动词用单数形式;

大量的a number of + 复数名词作主语, 谓语动词用复数,numbers of sth=a large number of sth

an amount of + 不可数名词
                
谓语:单数
                    

quantity of + 不可数名词
                
谓语:单数
                    

之所以numbers of使用起来经常出现错误是以为其在表意上会出现歧义的可能性,这里举一道题说明,

A Labor Department study states that the numbers of women employed outside the home grew more than a thirty-five percent increase in the past decade and accounted for more than sixty-two percent of the total growth in the civilian work force

(A)  numbers of women employed outside the home grew by more than a thirty-five percent increase

(B)  numbers of women employed outside the home grew more than thirty-five percent

(C)  numbers of women employed outside the home were raised by more than thirty-five percent

(D)  number of women employed outside the home increased by more than thirty-five percent

(E)  number of women employed outside the home was raised by more than a thirty-five percent increase

这里的ABC选项用numbers of women,由于numbers of sth=a large number of sth,因而这里The plural numbers means a large crowd or multitudewhile the singular number refers to a specific quantity of individuals

但在这道题中,因为是用的wild salmon’s numbers,可以避免产生这样的歧义

所以,当做题中看到numbers of sth的时候要提高警惕,看是否会引起歧义;当遇到one’s numbers的时候也要想一下到底是指的a quantity还是形容一大群


作者: Howto    时间: 2009-3-4 17:16

B number of wild salmon is reduced because deep-sea and coastal netting is not controlled

其实B中还有一个错就是这个is,注意A and B 做主语且表示的是不同事物谓语动词要用are!


作者: 丫丫兔    时间: 2009-3-4 18:48
以下是引用Howto在2009-3-4 17:16:00的发言:

B number of wild salmon is reduced because deep-sea and coastal netting is not controlled

其实B中还有一个错就是这个is,注意A and B 做主语且表示的是不同事物谓语动词要用are!

deep-sea 和coastal都是修饰 netting的啊../.所以不是are,是is
    


作者: vivian0331    时间: 2009-4-22 00:44

这道题总觉得wild salmon’s numbers 别扭,为什么不是the number of wild salmon呢?如果不考虑后面by平行的问题,这里是否可以用the number of的结构呢?


作者: vivian0331    时间: 2009-7-11 21:41

再问!

今天再做这道题又错了,就是看wild salmon’s numbers不顺眼


作者: 伊布拉莫维琨    时间: 2009-7-18 08:26

作者: xiaoniuren    时间: 2009-7-28 11:30

DING


作者: 北极虾仁    时间: 2009-8-5 01:06
看看啊
作者: val_2008    时间: 2009-8-18 14:26

不解。。。哪位NN来解释一下


作者: 双鱼游    时间: 2010-9-26 11:36
以前遇到the numbers 经常是错的,这个题注重考平行对称,那number只能解释为不同种类的数量,所以用复数
比如这道题
When the technique known as gene-splicing was invented in the early 1970's, it was feared that scientists might inadvertently create an "Andromeda strain," a microbe never before seen on Earth that might escape from the laboratory and it would kill vast numbers of humans who would have no natural defenses against it.

(A) it would kill vast numbers of humans who would have no natural defenses against it
(B) it might kill vast numbers of humans with no natural defenses against it
(C) kill vast numbers of humans who would have no natural defenses against it
(D) kill vast numbers of humans who have no natural defenses against them
(E) kill vast numbers of humans with no natural defenses against them
答案是C
BEATTHEGMAT论坛的解释是
Hey guys

So, technically "THE numbers of" or "A numbers of" is wrong - that whole thing, including the article in front, not just "numbers of." You can have "numbers of" without those articles, as in the example at the top of the thread.

(You can also, technically, have "the numbers of" if you are literally talking about multiple numbers - eg, two players have the numbers 7 and 13 on their jerseys, and I say "the numbers of the jerseys are 7 and 13." But that kind of set-up would be very unusual on this test.)

Also, remember that there's almost always an obscure exception to any rule you can think of. Annoying, but true. ("Being" is not always wrong either - it's just almost always wrong on the GMAT.) Because of the frequent, obscure exceptions, we should mostly just worry about the most likely / primary rules.
作者: 双鱼游    时间: 2010-9-26 11:43
再贴一道,大家归纳到一起
New Jersey's is one of the five highest number of reported cases of Lyme disease in the United States. D
(A) New Jersey's is one of the five highest number of reported
(B) New Jersey's is one of the five highest numbers in reporting
(C) New Jersey has a report of one of the five highest numbers of
(D) New Jersey has one of the five highest numbers of reported
(E) New Jersey reports one of the five highest number of
作者: 双鱼游    时间: 2010-9-26 11:44
还是beatthegmat论坛一位instructor的对上题的解释
In that other thread, I said that you can say "the numbers of" in the rare circumstance that you are literally talking about multiple, different numbers. And that's exactly what we're talking about here. Construct a scenario to illustrate:

New Jersey has 10 reported cases
New York has 14 reported cases
Hawaii has 9 reported cases
Maine has 12 reported cases
Michigan has 8 reported cases.

There are five numbers: 8, 9, 10, 12, and 14. If I tell you these are the five highest (of all of the states), then New Jersey's number (10) is among the five highest numbers. Make sense?




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3