AA51
The following appeared in a magazine article on trends and lifestyles.
“In general, people are not as concerned as they were a decade ago about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses. Walk into the Heart’s Delight, a store that started selling organic fruits and vegetables and whole-grain flours in the
thx。。
the conclusion of the author is "people are not as concerned as they were a decade ago about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses
the author has two evidence :
1, a store that started selling organic fruits and vegetables still sells cheeses and meat无因果联系
2,the owners of vegetarian restaurant make a much more modest living than the owners of the new House of Beef gratuitous assumption 结论无据 the conclusion In this argument is that people are not as concerned as they were a decade ago about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses. In support of this conclusion the arguer supplies the evidence that ．．． the author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. the author uses the positive correlation between A and B to establish causality . However, the fact that a coincides with B does not necessarily prove that A caused B．But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example ,perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D. futhermore , the author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that the owners of vegetarian restaurant make less profits than the owners of the new House of Beef . however, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that…, Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility last but not least , it is necessary to point out that even it is ture that the owners of vegetarian restaurant make less profits than the owners of the new House of Beef , hardly can somebody conclude that people are not as concerned as they were a decade ago about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses.there are planty of other possible conclusions can be made by the fact that A is poorer than B.
the conclusion In this argument is that people are not as concerned as they were a decade ago about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses. In support of this conclusion the arguer supplies the evidence that ．．．
the author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. the author uses the positive correlation between A and B to establish causality . However, the fact that a coincides with B does not necessarily prove that A caused B．But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example ,perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.
futhermore , the author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that the owners of vegetarian restaurant make less profits than the owners of the new House of Beef . however, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that…, Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility
last but not least , it is necessary to point out that even it is ture that the owners of vegetarian restaurant make less profits than the owners of the new House of Beef , hardly can somebody conclude that people are not as concerned as they were a decade ago about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses.there are planty of other possible conclusions can be made by the fact that A is poorer than B.
其实题目是讲什么我就不懂..可以帮忙翻译一下吗..?
The following appeared in a magazine article on trends and lifestyles.
“In general, people are not as concerned as they were a decade ago about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses. Walk into the Heart’s Delight, a store that started selling organic fruits and vegetables and whole-grain flours in the
thx。。
大致是说一片发表在杂志里的关于生活趋势和生活方式的文章说：
现在的人们不再像以前一样，那么在意限制自己摄取红肉类和高脂肪芝士了．走进 HD，就是一60年代开的，本来卖有机水果和蔬菜以及面粉的店，现在还卖芝士以及黄油．再往隔壁，GEC的店主，（GEC就一素食店）依然过着简朴的生活，而对面卖牛肉的已经发了．
thx..跟我bf分析的一样..
但是我据理力争可能人家有钱不可以过modest life 吗..
郁闷..
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |