ChaseDream

标题: [求助]刘振民的《语法改错精解》P115 E7－8 [打印本页]

作者: Pesce 时间: 2008-9-16 12:21
标题: [求助]刘振民的《语法改错精解》P115 E7－8

12．The attorney turned down the law firm’s offer of a position because she suspected that it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting.
A) quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promotion.
B) quota,having no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
C) quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventually promotion.

D)quota, not reflecting a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion

答案是C），解释说A）、B）和D）中划线部分都是修饰限定quoto，A)还好理解，但是B)和D）为什么不能理解现在分词做伴随结果呢？（主语为it,和C中省略的主语一样）谢谢各位大虾。

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-16 13:08:12编辑过]

作者: syflysun 时间: 2008-9-16 15:14

理解为伴随可以的，但是别人也可以把B,D理解为是The attorney这个主语的伴随呀，这样的话就不对了，也就是我们一直说的歧义了，你这样理解我那样理解。

还有伴随-ing一般有持续延续的意思，这里似乎也不妥。

还有c不是省略主语，是共用主语，是并列。

个人意见，仅供参考哦

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)