A survey of entrepreneurs who started companies last year shows that while virtually all did substantial preparatory research and planning, only half used that work to produce a formal business plan. Since, on average, the entrepreneurs without formal plans secured the capital they needed in half the time of those with plans, these survey results indicate that, in general, formal plans did not help the entrepreneurs who produced them to secure the capital they needed.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
想问的就是这个 long-standing business relationship.有什么用啊? C说的是什么意思呢?
谢谢大家
我的想法是
Since, on average, the entrepreneurs without formal plans secured the capital they needed in half the time of those with plans, these survey results indicate that, in general, formal plans did not help the entrepreneurs who produced them to secure the capital they needed.
看这个因果关系 他说 没有f plans的企业家secured the capital的时间是那些有plans的一半 于是他推论是这个plans对于secured the capital 没用
那削弱
C说 这些没有plans的人的投资大部分来自于长期的经济合作关系
这个意思就是说 时间短不是因为没有plans 而是因为他们寻找的投资人很可靠 你想啊 长期投资 很靠的住啊 于是这就是他因削弱了吧
就是说 如果你有plans但是你同样有长期合作人 那么你的时间照样短 也就是说这个secured the capital不取决于你有没有plans 而在于你有没有长期合作人
个人意见 仅供参考
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |