假设主要以两种方式出现，“桥梁型”和“排除他因型”。排除他因是不是也可以看成支持的答案？
支持：是支持文章结论。
到底怎么样简介的理解两者在选项中的区别，请各位NN出手。。
我来试试。
我看成是这样两种题（1）supporter题;(2)defender题，应该分别对应你的桥梁和排除他应题。
首先是读题找出文章中的结论句。
然后看文章中的premise和conclusion之间有没有存在GAP：如果存在GAP，那就是supportor题，如果没有存在GAP那就是defender题。然后分别用各自的方法来解题。
找GAP的方法：两种：（A）conclusion中出现新信息;(B)premise中的重要信息，conclusion中没有。
我这里简单给出两个例子：
A类GAP---OG11第2题，新信息profits;
B类GAP---0G11第81题，重要信息premise中的on Maryland highways.
出现GAP就是第一类supporter题，用常识和根据题中给出的信息“搭桥”
如果没有GAP就是第二类defender题，先对题目取非---然后能够削弱原题结论的选项就是正确答案。
我就是这样做ASSUMPTION题的，发现每一题都能对号入座，大大加快了做题速度。希望对你有帮助。祝你考试成功。
Thanks Dirrrk, 按照你提供的方法我分析了一些题目。。。。请探讨一下这题。。有点疑问。
77. How do the airlines expect to prevent commercial plane crashes? Studies have shown that pilot error contributes to two-thirds of all such crashes. To address this problem, the airline have upgraded their training programs by increasing the hours of classroom instruction and emphasizing communication skills in the cockpit. But it is unrealistic to expect such measures to compensate for pilots’ lack of actual flying time. Therefore, the airlines should rethink their training approach to reducing commercial crashes.
Which one of the following is an assumption upon which the argument depends?
A. Training programs can eliminate pilot errors.
B. Commercial pilot routinely undergo additional training throughout their careers.
C. The number of airline crashes will decrease if pilot training programs focus on increasing actual flying time.
D. Lack of actual flying time is an important contributor to pilot error in commercial plane crashes.
E. Communication skills are not important to pilot training programs
FEIFEI的逻辑题，
思路：xxx的program 不能补充pilots’ lack of actual flying time.结论：thererfore, rethink approach to prevent commercial plane crash. 中间有思维跳跃，actual flying time 与plane crash 什么关系？
A. 削弱，program can eliminate…, so do not need rethink approach
B. 无关。题中是prevent planes crashes的training.
C. 加强。
D. 将actual flying time 与(pilot error in) plane crashes 联系起来。对assumption取非：actual flying time is not an important contributor to pilot error in commercial plane crashes. 削弱结论。符合ETS假设定义。
E. 加强。
C说是加强，我觉得选C也可以。。。。
应该是C吧
But it is unrealistic to expect such measures to compensate for pilots’ lack of actual flying time. Therefore, the airlines should rethink their training approach to reducing commercial crashes. 这个整句话应该是结论
lack of actual flying time是NEW INFORMATION，与前面的crash就形成了GAP了
C刚好填补这个GAP
你们说的真深奥
我一直的理解是 假设 就是前提 就是没有这个前提 那题目中的内容就不能存在
支持 是加强 是补充证据 没有它题目也成了 有了它 题目会更站得住脚 加强嘛 顾名思义
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |