Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation
of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers
are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular
publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to
concentrating one sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership.
Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this
must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious
material.
Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen
the argument?
A.
The
advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.
B.
Some
advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed
publication.
C.
The
advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the
changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.
D.
People who
generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that
concentrate on sex and violence.
E.
It was
expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a
different income group.
请问,为什么选C?
题目说:人们往往谴责广告商没有道德感,但是最近的一个杂志因为添加了暴力内容,广告商大部分撤掉了在其上的广告 (大意啊 没有仔细翻)
问题问加强
答案C 说 如果他们不撤回会增加收益,如果撤回则销量降低
再来看事实 题中说他们撤回了 以此证明他们有道德感 不和暴力同流合污 哪怕面对收益增加的吸引
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |