Q40.
Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives. However, since there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. These wine makers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine.
B. Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce the allergic reactions.
C. Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.
D. Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction.
E. Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these wine makers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.
答案选的是E, 可是我觉得应该是D啊, 因为E说S不会在酒中大量的存在以致于使人们对它有过敏反映, 然而文中本来就是说这个WINE MAKES不会把这种S放入酒中,所以才使得怕过敏的人来喝, 这样E选项就是在重复原文,没有任何意义啊, 而D 不就是一个很好的假设答案吗, 说只有在保证除了S 之外的任何酒中的物质都不会对人产生过敏才能使得更多人去放心的喝它啊,所以我觉得D才象是假设题型的答案啊
this Q does not involve other ingreidents causing negative health to people except sulfite, so D is not correct choice.
for e, i think you misunderstand "Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these wine makers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines." It says wine originally does not contain enough sulfite to cause allergy, if winemakers do not add, the statement in topic is correct.
你的意思是说E强调了这种S不是原来就自然生存在这种酒里这个前提是吗?
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |