ChaseDream
标题: PREP2 中一道题 [打印本页]
作者: hesterwyx 时间: 2008-9-8 00:21
标题: PREP2 中一道题
There is a widespread belief in the United States and Western Europe that young people have a smaller commitment to work and a career than their parents and grandparents and that the source of the change lies in the collapse of the "work ethic."
(A) a smaller commitment to work and a career than their parents and grandparents
(B) less of a commitment to work and a career than their parents and grandparents
(C) a smaller commitment to work and a career than that of their parents and grandparents
(D) less of a commitment to work and a career than their parents and grandparents had
(E) a lessening of the commitment to work and a career that their parents and grandparents had
为什么选D,不选C呢?是不是commitment不能用small来形容?那么D最后那个had如何解释?前面的have是时以动词,那么后面应该加did,从什么地方看出要用过去完成时呢?
作者: zliycwn1 时间: 2008-9-8 00:24
我觉得在美语中have可能可以作为比较特殊的实意动词
这里是主语比较 young peole和parents..比较 但是young people后有宾语 所以补充谓语比较好 不会产生歧义
作者: dianecarton 时间: 2008-9-8 01:12
less是副词,修饰动词have。have a commitment是个动词词组,表示前后比较的句子里,修饰的话应选择副词修饰have,而非形容词smaller修饰commitment.否则会造成歧义。
比如两年raise costs的比较,也是用less而不是fewer.
作者: AlienX 时间: 2008-9-8 01:20
umm...看法不一樣
smaller跟less都是形容詞.
less of vs. less:
用less of如果後接the/a/an/his/her/their之類, 如果不是可以不用of
less是用在不可數的東東上...commitment是一個abstract noun...不可數...
作者: hesterwyx 时间: 2008-9-8 01:31
我觉得less还是形容词,不是副词。不然的话变成have (less) of a commitment了,怎么能说have of something呢?
作者: dianecarton 时间: 2008-9-8 01:36
LZ参考一下PREP24---28,题号记得不太清楚了,有一道employment costs rose...的题目,看看两道题类似不?
作者: AlienX 时间: 2008-9-8 01:48
hmm...I know which question you are referring to.
in fact, I should take back the words, "smaller跟less都是形容詞"
因為less可以是形容詞, 也可以是副詞
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/less
可是我上面講的still hold true...(除了"smaller跟less都是形容詞")
I have a smaller car than you have.
I have less money than you have.
smaller vs. less要看後面的是不是可數的東東
作者: amorela 时间: 2008-10-27 19:31
ding
作者: smartsky11 时间: 2009-3-20 13:05
在
作者: readerfan 时间: 2009-6-25 18:00
还是不明白为什么不是did,而用had。XDF老师说,than后面的助动词,加优先于不加,但如果加错了(Had instead of did),还不如不加。Confused!!
作者: falconcn 时间: 2009-6-25 22:51
我觉得此处的had是实意动词:
young people have sth...than their parents and grandparents had...
作者: sunny8843 时间: 2009-8-9 09:29
up
作者: z89113570 时间: 2009-9-3 10:28
up
作者: jupiter410 时间: 2009-9-8 15:39
up
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |