标题: LSAT-3-1-16. LSAT-3-1-18, help [打印本页] 作者: wujie_ren 时间: 2004-1-19 13:19 标题: LSAT-3-1-16. LSAT-3-1-18, help LSAT-3-I-16. The current proposal to give college students a broader choice in planning their own courses of study should be abandoned. The students who are supporting the proposal will never be satisfied, no matter what requirements are established. Some of these students have reached their third year without declaring a major. One first-year student has failed to complete four required courses. Several others have indicated a serious indifference to grades and intellectual achievement.
A flaw in the argument is that it does which one of the following?
(A) avoids the issue by focusing on supporters of the proposal (B) argues circularly by assuming the conclusion is true in stating th e premises. (C) fails to define the critical term "satisfied" (D) distorts the proposal advocated by opponents (E) users the term "student" equivocally why A is the flaw?
LSAT-3-I-18 The question whether intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is certainly imprecise, because we are not sure how different from use something might be and still count as "intelligent life" Yet we cannot just decide to define "intelligent life" in some more precise way since it is likely that we will find and recognize intelligent life elsewhere in the universe only if we leave our definitions open to new, unimagined possibilities.
18. The passage, if seen as an objection to an antecedent claim. Challenges that claim by:
(A) showing the claim to be irrelevant to the issue at hand (B) citing examples that fail to fit proposed definition of "intelligent life" (C) claiming that "intelligent life" cannot be adequately defined. (D) arguing that the claim, if acted on, would be counterproductive (E) maintaining that the claim is not supported by the available evidence.
The key is D, a kind of confused why D is right.
作者: 绿水长流 时间: 2004-2-4 08:10
无人解答？？ help~~~~作者: 冬眠猫 时间: 2004-2-4 13:46
有人在吗？可以帮忙解释吗？谢谢作者: lawyer_1 时间: 2004-2-5 03:03
1.典型的诉诸人的逻辑错误. 原文: 因为支持该建议的人不行, 所以该建议不行 2.C,D易混,其它易排除.但C中的"ADEQUATELY DEFINED"与原文的"CANNOT DECIDE TO DEFINE"本质不同.故排除.对于D:关键在原文最后一句话的理解.它的意思是:因为如果我们已对"INTELLIGENT LIFE"精确定义,则我们将不能在其它地方找到INTELLIGENT LIFE, 所以我们决定不精确定义INTELLIGENT LIFE. 也即会产生反后果作者: 冬眠猫 时间: 2004-2-5 11:12
lawyer,能问问你这题目The passage, if seen as an objection to an antecedent claim. Challenges that claim by本身是什么意思吗？我还没看懂你的解释，谢谢！作者: lawyer_1 时间: 2004-2-5 23:02
本题为ARGUMENT TECHNIQUE题型, ANTECEDENT CLAIM是指原文的"WHETHER......IN THE UNIVERSE".PASSAGE认为这种说法不精确, 明白题目的意思吗: 本段落,如果看作是反驳以前的CLAIM,使用了什麽反驳方法作者: 绿水长流 时间: 2004-2-6 02:02
说得很清楚了，是我没看明白ANTECEDENT CLAIM指的是什么，谢谢！请你吃元宵，在梦网情缘：）作者: weiyu 时间: 2004-3-10 00:26
L3-1-18
I hold a different view on the question. The passage refers to the argument. Antecedent claim refers to the claim mentioned in question no.17, that is the new intelligent life can be found only if the definition is precise. 请高手指点fficeffice" />
ffice" />