ChaseDream

标题: [求助]prep1-98 比较prep-33 [打印本页]

作者: dustinxing    时间: 2008-9-1 11:42
标题: [求助]prep1-98 比较prep-33

关于more than结构是否能充当同位语?

prep1-98

A decade after initiating the nation's most comprehensive and aggressive antismoking program, per capita consumption of cigarettes in California declined from over 125 packs annually per person to about 60, a drop more than twice as great as in the nation as a whole.

(A) per capita consumption of cigarettes in California declined from over 125 packs annually per person to about 60, a drop more than twice as great as

(B) annual per capita consumption of cigarettes in California declined from over 125 packs to about 60, more than twice as great as that

(C) California's annual per capita consumption of cigarettes declined from over 125 packs per person to about 60, more than twice as great as the drop

(D) California has seen per capita consumption of cigarettes decline from over 125 packs annually to about 60, a drop more than twice as great as that

(E) California has seen annual per capita consumption of cigarettes decline from over 125 packs per person to about 60, more than twice as great as that

答案:D

prep1-33

More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake
                    Baikal, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined. 
 

(A) More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake
                    Baika, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.

                

(B) With 20 percent of the world's fresh water, that is more than all the North American Great Lakes combined, Siberia's Lake
                Baikal has more than 300 rivers that drain into it.

(C) Siberia's Lake
                Baikal, with more than 300 rivers draining into it, it holds more of the world's fresh water than all that of the North American Great Lakes combined, 20 percent.

(D) While more than 300 rivers drain into it, Siberia's Lake
                Baikal holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, which is more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.

(E) More than all the North American Great Lakes combined, Siberia's Lake
                    Baikal, with more than 300 rivers draining into it, holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water.

            

答案:A

问题:

prep对于这两题的解释明显存在矛盾,98题(prep解释为E的错误在于more than不是合理的同位语结构,所以用a drop概括前面部分的意思,构成独立主格);33题(prep解释为A的more than结构是很好的同位语结构),按照我的理解,是否应该把答案改成 the quantity more than all the North American Great Lakes combined ?

查询了以前的帖子,同僚有同样疑惑:http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=340678&replyID=&skin=1

请各位NN指教,谢谢!

查询了以前的帖子,同僚有同样疑惑:http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=340678&replyID=&skin=1

请各位NN指教,谢谢!


作者: jonathan1987    时间: 2008-10-5 22:48

同问,我33也是选e的

a的morethan是修饰啥的呀?


作者: minirainbow    时间: 2008-10-26 22:25

33. more than 300 rivers在这边我认为就是句子的主词,并没有修饰谁

然后后面的more than all the North American Great Lakes combined就是作同位语修饰20 percent of the world's fresh water

我在这边是疑惑选项(D)

非限制形容词子句which不能修饰名词短语马?

例如他说which不能指20 percent of the world's fresh water 只能指the world's fresh water

那同位语就可以修饰名词短语?

请NN帮忙解惑......


作者: minirainbow    时间: 2008-11-3 07:00
頂一下.....
作者: snowlemon    时间: 2009-2-5 14:14
我不是nn,
d中的which, 确实是有歧义,不知道是修饰谁,可以是fresh water, 可以是world's fresh warter,还可以是20% world's fresh warter


作者: grape262001    时间: 2009-2-24 10:55

我也有对于E的疑惑,觉得E的解释关于将BAIKAL与5大湖直接进行比较,概念不对等有问题,湖与湖比较应该对等才对啊。

而且,E选项还原之后应该是More than all the North American Great Lakes combined, Siberia's Lake Baikal holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water.我不觉的整句话有问题啊。

且这里我的疑问是combined是作为后置定语还是做谓语啊?如果是谓语的话,比较的两边时态不对等啊?

请指教!


作者: Mayanist    时间: 2009-2-25 01:16
以下是引用dustinxing在2008-9-1 11:42:00的发言:

关于more than结构是否能充当同位语?

prep1-98

A decade after initiating the nation's most comprehensive and aggressive antismoking program, per capita consumption of cigarettes in California declined from over 125 packs annually per person to about 60, a drop more than twice as great as in the nation as a whole.

(A) per capita consumption of cigarettes in California declined from over 125 packs annually per person to about 60, a drop more than twice as great as

(B) annual per capita consumption of cigarettes in California declined from over 125 packs to about 60, more than twice as great as that

(C) California's annual per capita consumption of cigarettes declined from over 125 packs per person to about 60, more than twice as great as the drop

(D) California has seen per capita consumption of cigarettes decline from over 125 packs annually to about 60, a drop more than twice as great as that

(E) California has seen annual per capita consumption of cigarettes decline from over 125 packs per person to about 60, more than twice as great as that

答案:D

prep1-33

More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake
     Baikal, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined. 
 

(A) More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake
     Baika, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.

    

(B) With 20 percent of the world's fresh water, that is more than all the North American Great Lakes combined, Siberia's Lake
    Baikal has more than 300 rivers that drain into it.

(C) Siberia's Lake
    Baikal, with more than 300 rivers draining into it, it holds more of the world's fresh water than all that of the North American Great Lakes combined, 20 percent.

(D) While more than 300 rivers drain into it, Siberia's Lake
    Baikal holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, which is more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.

(E) More than all the North American Great Lakes combined, Siberia's Lake
     Baikal, with more than 300 rivers draining into it, holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water.

   

答案:A

问题:

prep对于这两题的解释明显存在矛盾,98题(prep解释为E的错误在于more than不是合理的同位语结构,所以用a drop概括前面部分的意思,构成独立主格);33题(prep解释为A的more than结构是很好的同位语结构),按照我的理解,是否应该把答案改成 the quantity more than all the North American Great Lakes combined ?

查询了以前的帖子,同僚有同样疑惑:http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=340678&replyID=&skin=1

请各位NN指教,谢谢!

查询了以前的帖子,同僚有同样疑惑:http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=340678&replyID=&skin=1

请各位NN指教,谢谢!

查询了以前的帖子,同僚有同样疑惑:http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=340678&replyID=&skin=1

请各位NN指教,谢谢!

这两题还是有区别的。98 中a drop 概括了 decline from ... to 这个过程,所以要用 a drop 对全句概括;而33题more than ...结构是与20 percent of the world's fresh water, 而不是与holds 20% of ... 同位,所以没有必要a quantity。

关于33题E选项,more than all the North American Great Lakes combined 是不能修饰紧接的的Lake Baikal的: 首先combined是过去分词,受动者是All NA Great Lakes,而不是Lake Baikal; 其次,逻辑上more than all ...是修饰20% of the World's fresh water, 作为同位语放在其后面。


作者: grape262001    时间: 2009-2-25 11:19

按照ls的观点,将combined作为过去分词,起到后置定语的作用,E选项确实有点问题。

将E还原之后,为

 Siberia's Lake Baikal holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water more than all the North American Great Lakes.

那么如果是lake Baikal与all the North American Great Lakes相比,产生歧义,没有补足助动词。如果将20 percent of the world's fresh water与all the North American Great Lakes相比,比较对象不对等。

是否可以这样理解呢?

请指教!


作者: smartsky11    时间: 2009-3-26 23:16
而温柔
作者: smartsky11    时间: 2009-3-28 11:11
up
作者: lcy19812000    时间: 2009-4-3 16:39

回答楼主问题:

more than不能作同位语,但能作定语/状语。

以prep1-98为例:正确答案D为:

A decade after initiating the nation's most comprehensive and aggressive antismoking program,  California has seen per capita consumption of cigarettes decline from over 125 packs annually to about 60, a drop more than twice as great as that in the nation as a whole.

如果D省去a drop,more than短语可以在句末作状语修饰主句动词seen,逻辑不对。more than也可看作省略了which is的非限制性定语修饰前面的名词60,同样逻辑不通。

为了清楚地跳跃修饰60前面的名词decline,我们必须将定语改为同位语结构:a drop more than。drop非常有针对性地指代decline这个过程而不会产生修饰60的歧义,既符合语法规则又符合逻辑。


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-3 17:17:30编辑过]

作者: tingyu0807    时间: 2009-5-10 23:17
以下是引用minirainbow在2008-10-26 22:25:00的发言:

33. more than 300 rivers在这边我认为就是句子的主词,并没有修饰谁

然后后面的more than all the North American Great Lakes combined就是作同位语修饰20 percent of the world's fresh water

我在这边是疑惑选项(D)

非限制形容词子句which不能修饰名词短语马?

例如他说which不能指20 percent of the world's fresh water 只能指the world's fresh water

那同位语就可以修饰名词短语?

请NN帮忙解惑......

同疑问,期待NN解答。。。


作者: Skyllis    时间: 2009-8-1 01:43

More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake
     Baikal, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined. 
 

(A) More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake
     Baika, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.

    

(B) With 20 percent of the world's fresh water, that is more than all the North American Great Lakes combined, Siberia's Lake
    Baikal has more than 300 rivers that drain into it.

(C) Siberia's Lake
    Baikal, with more than 300 rivers draining into it, it holds more of the world's fresh water than all that of the North American Great Lakes combined, 20 percent.

(D) While more than 300 rivers drain into it, Siberia's Lake
    Baikal holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, which is more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.

(E) More than all the North American Great Lakes combined, Siberia's Lake
     Baikal, with more than 300 rivers draining into it, holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water.

   E中More than all the North American Great Lakes combined修饰Siberia's Lake Baikal,Siberia's Lake Baikal不能More than all the North American Great Lakes combined,

正确比较是holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water More than all the North American Great Lakes combined


作者: hughlv    时间: 2009-8-1 02:54
以下是引用minirainbow在2008/10/26 22:25:00的发言:

33. more than 300 rivers在这边我认为就是句子的主词,并没有修饰谁

然后后面的more than all the North American Great Lakes combined就是作同位语修饰20 percent of the world's fresh water

我在这边是疑惑选项(D)

非限制形容词子句which不能修饰名词短语马?

例如他说which不能指20 percent of the world's fresh water 只能指the world's fresh water

那同位语就可以修饰名词短语?

请NN帮忙解惑......

在我非专业只凭语感做题的水平看来,D)的问题是While,要是改成With我就会觉得蛮好了。which指代的就是20 percent of the world's fresh water,因为20 percent of是量词

(D) With more than 300 rivers drain into it, Siberia's Lake
    Baikal holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, which is more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.

网上搜到了这样的例句,不知道能不能相提并论。20 percent of the world's fresh water 应该与 20 pounds of water从结构上没有什么区别吧。

Vein specialists at Hogue Vein Institute have performed over 7,000 endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) procedures to effectively treat patients with symptomatic varicose veins, which is more than any other vein treatment center in Minnesota or North Dakota.


作者: judyenglish    时间: 2009-8-4 11:27
ding
作者: sunny8843    时间: 2009-8-5 11:37
up
作者: alibaba_2009    时间: 2009-8-8 06:33

up


作者: ed88student    时间: 2009-8-19 17:10
以下是引用grape262001在2009/2/24 10:55:00的发言:

我也有对于E的疑惑,觉得E的解释关于将BAIKAL与5大湖直接进行比较,概念不对等有问题,湖与湖比较应该对等才对啊。

而且,E选项还原之后应该是More than all the North American Great Lakes combined, Siberia's Lake Baikal holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water.我不觉的整句话有问题啊。

且这里我的疑问是combined是作为后置定语还是做谓语啊?如果是谓语的话,比较的两边时态不对等啊?

请指教!

我认为原句中More than all the North American Great Lakes combined修饰20 percent water, 意思是BAIKAL的水比5大湖的水加起来要多,而E选项中More than all the North American Great Lakes combined用来修饰5大湖,意思是BAIKAL比五大湖加起来要多,逻辑意思不合理。

笔记上所说的“将BAIKAL与5大湖直接进行比较,概念不对等有问题”应该是这个意思吧。


作者: zliycwn1    时间: 2009-8-19 19:06
a drop的加入是为了避免产生歧义,到底是下降的幅度是过去的两倍还是end value 60是过去的两倍
作者: songgigi    时间: 2009-9-5 09:34
Hi All,

Following is one of the right answers of GMAT Prep question:

Can someone please help me understand how the following comparison is complete. Don't we need "that of" before "all" to complete the comparison.

===========================================
More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake Baikal, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.
==============================================


There are some examples in OG where it clearly say that in order to complete the comparison we need to have that/those. Can some one please tell why the same is not the case here ?




=============================================

The original question is copy pasted below for quick reference. The OA is "A"
                    

More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake Baikal, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.
                    

A. More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake Baikal, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.

B. With 20 percent of the world's fresh water, that is more than all the North American Great Lakes combined, Siberia's Lake Baikal has more than 300 rivers that drain into it.

C. Siberia's Lake Baikal, with more than 300 rivers draining into it, it holds more of the world's fresh water than all that of the North American Great Lakes combined, 20 percent.

D. While more than 300 rivers drain into it, Siberia's Lake Baikal holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, which is more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.

E. More than all the North American Great Lakes combined, Siberia's Lake Baikal, with more than 300 rivers draining into it, holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water.



We would have used the relative pronoun "that" to refer to fresh water, if we were comparing fresh water.. Here the case is that we are not comparing fresh water capacity of lake baikal with that of other north american lakes..

we are just comparing the total capacity of lake baikal.. its a special quality of lake baikal tht it holds fresh water...

Let's say the total number of litres of the world's fresh water = 100
then Lake baikals capacity out of hundred = 20
Let's say that total capacity of north american lakes = 18

Now all we are saying is that "More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake Baikal, which holds 20 litres of fresh water, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.

and so you can see that we don't need to use the relative pronoun..

2.

yeah, ok, i see what you're saying. that's a very good question.

here's what's going on here:
"more than all the North American Great Lakes combined" is actually a MODIFIER of "20% of the world's fresh water", which is WITHIN the first MODIFIER. therefore, it's a SUB-modifier, so to speak.

let me try to illustrate it graphically:

More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake Baikal(, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water(, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined)).

the blue modifier modifies stuff that's inside the orange modifier, so it falls within the orbit of the orange modifier; it MUST be removed if the orange modifier is removed (because it has nothing left to modify).

let me know whether this makes sense.

orange and blue: go gators!




作者: ivyfeng    时间: 2009-9-26 15:31
PREP对这题的解释没什么大的问题,但是有一些小的点不大对。

首先,上面提到的which修饰noun phrase的问题,在句子清晰无歧义的情况下,which是可以指代名词词组的,which这个点不是主要的排除点。

其次,关于大家说道的同位语的问题,现需要说明的是less/more这两个词有点特殊(看到过less的解释,以此类推more),他们可以做adj,adv,n 如果PREP语法解释将其理解为同位语,那应该是将其词性定位n,不过lz给出的另一个例子明显是做adj modifier的,这道题不论判定为什么词性都不影响理解和解答。(注:是A中的后一个more than,不是前一个,请看清prep语法笔记)

至于比较对象的问题,大家不要钻牛角尖。这里的比较对象A和B,B肯定就是 all the North American Great Lakes combined.  至于A的话要么是20% of...要么是S Lake,应该是前者。至于C选项除去prep笔记提到的错误,“it holds more of the world's fresh water than all that of the North American Great Lakes combined, 20 percent” 比较也不对,有歧义:到底是(it holds) more of the world's fresh water than( all that of the North American Great Lakes combined did)还是it holds more (of the world's fresh water )than (all that of the North American Great Lakes combined),()内为比较对象。同时那个20%吊在最后很不舒服。
其实 the North American Great Lakes combined就是指 the North American Great Lakes合起来的水

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/9/26 15:33:03编辑过]

作者: Saixss    时间: 2009-10-26 11:41

我觉得其实这两道题均强调的是比较中比较对象要对等的问题,而产生这种表面差异也正是由于要保证比较对象对等的问题。

98题中,B选项如果直接用MORE than 的表达会产生比较对象的缺失或者是比较的歧意:that in the nation要不就是没有比较对象,要不就只能与60对比,不合题意,故a drop就是为了弥补比较的对象所补出的同位语。

而在下一题里,more than 有比较对象可以直接比较


作者: 妖怪毛毛    时间: 2009-10-26 17:34

作者: kily8878860    时间: 2010-9-10 16:24
haoa
作者: 夜色微蓝    时间: 2011-4-17 10:49

作者: xiaoqiaoli    时间: 2011-5-28 18:54
总感觉33题不懂啊。。。有木有nn过来解答一下啊~~~
作者: mia113    时间: 2011-7-27 16:40
看了N多遍还是不同意解释上说MORE THAN做同位语修饰20% of the world's fresh water.
因为OG上说过同位语修饰  A OF B结构· 应修饰的是A中心语  不是B 也不是整体A B
所以这里MORE THAN如果做同位语的话只能是20%   不可能同lakes combined比较了

记得同位语这个修饰 语法点是来自: translation of liadi(作品名字忘了), a work....
这里得work就是值得translation而非作品本身····
希望有人能帮我解惑吖·
再一次做这题 又错了····哎···
作者: mia113    时间: 2011-7-27 17:00
看到35题 直接更悲催了·
In laboratory rats, a low dose of aspirin usually suffices to block production of thromboxane,
which is a substance that promotes blood clotting, but not seriously interfering with the
production of prostacyclin, which prevents clotting.
(A) which is a substance that promotes blood clotting, but not seriously interfering
(B) a substance that promotes blood clotting, but not seriously interfering
(C) a substance that promotes blood clotting, but does not seriously interfere
(D) which is a substance to promote blood clotting, but does not seriously interfere
(E) which is a substance that promotes blood clotting, but not a serious interference

substance 同位语修饰的是thromboxane,  又是A OF B结构·修饰的却是B  我惶恐了····
哪位好心人士来救救我吖·········
作者: schlaf    时间: 2011-8-6 23:40
Hi All,

Following is one of the right answers of GMAT Prep question:

Can someone please help me understand how the following comparison is complete. Don't we need "that of" before "all" to complete the comparison.

===========================================
More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake Baikal, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.
==============================================


There are some examples in OG where it clearly say that in order to complete the comparison we need to have that/those. Can some one please tell why the same is not the case here ?




=============================================

The original question is copy pasted below for quick reference. The OA is "A"


More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake Baikal, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.


A. More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake Baikal, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.

B. With 20 percent of the world's fresh water, that is more than all the North American Great Lakes combined, Siberia's Lake Baikal has more than 300 rivers that drain into it.

C. Siberia's Lake Baikal, with more than 300 rivers draining into it, it holds more of the world's fresh water than all that of the North American Great Lakes combined, 20 percent.

D. While more than 300 rivers drain into it, Siberia's Lake Baikal holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, which is more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.

E. More than all the North American Great Lakes combined, Siberia's Lake Baikal, with more than 300 rivers draining into it, holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water.


We would have used the relative pronoun "that" to refer to fresh water, if we were comparing fresh water.. Here the case is that we are not comparing fresh water capacity of lake baikal with that of other north american lakes..

we are just comparing the total capacity of lake baikal.. its a special quality of lake baikal tht it holds fresh water...

Let's say the total number of litres of the world's fresh water = 100
then Lake baikals capacity out of hundred = 20
Let's say that total capacity of north american lakes = 18

Now all we are saying is that "More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake Baikal, which holds 20 litres of fresh water, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.

and so you can see that we don't need to use the relative pronoun..
2.
yeah, ok, i see what you're saying. that's a very good question.

here's what's going on here:
"more than all the North American Great Lakes combined" is actually a MODIFIER of "20% of the world's fresh water", which is WITHIN the first MODIFIER. therefore, it's a SUB-modifier, so to speak.

let me try to illustrate it graphically:

More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake Baikal(, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water(, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined)).

the blue modifier modifies stuff that's inside the orange modifier, so it falls within the orbit of the orange modifier; it MUST be removed if the orange modifier is removed (because it has nothing left to modify).

let me know whether this makes sense.

orange and blue: go gators!




-- by 会员 songgigi (2009/9/5 9:34:00)



这个解释比较好。虽然 还是有一点点模糊。
作者: mysonnic    时间: 2014-11-15 11:00
贴一个。。。。

这道题原句主干是300条河汇入贝加尔湖,两个修饰成分解释说明贝加尔湖。

B 前面是极长的状语,整体结构头重脚轻。用OG常说的话就是awkward。须知很多语法现象,如后置、形式主语  等其实都是在竭力避免这个问题。

C 去掉插入的with结构,主语贝加尔湖和谓语holds之间多了it。把more than 20% 肢解四散到各处,导致more of xxx,比较级后不能用of表示范围,最高级才可以——He is tallest of the three,不可说He is taller of the three., 同时20% percent成为孤儿成分,不知修饰说明谁或者补充谁,简直不知所谓。

D While引导句子,要么表时间,要么是表转折。逻辑上原句说的是个常态,而不是说当300条河注入时贝加尔湖就淡水丰富堪比北美五大湖总和,而当它们断流时情况就不同了,所以不是表时间的。全句说的只有一个意思,没有相对应和违背的另一层意思,所以也不存在转折关系。因而,不可用while引导。which 引导的定语从句中是个比较结构,which 显然指其前的fresh water,而than的后面是五大湖,不论是否combine, 淡水和湖都是非同质或同态的东西,在GMAT里不可以作为比较结构的双方。

E 一开篇的比较结构用的是多功能的more(原级有many, much,还可加在不能加er/est 的形容词、副词前表比较),而且没有额外补充说明比较的范畴,使人摸不着头脑:到底什么比五大湖多呢?当然并非比较结构不可以放在句首,而是一定要是个明确的比较才可以。看下面:

Longer than any other rivers in China, Changjiang ....

这个比较结构就很明确,因为longer只是long的比较级,非常明确,读者不做它想直接明白比较的是长度。相对的,如果是more, 无法推测到底是many还是much,而many和much可修饰和说明的方面又太多了,所以明确起见可在结构中加以限制说明,如More fresh water than all the NorthAmerican Great Lakes combined, 说明比较的是淡水资源的多少,或者More sendiment of minerals than all the NorthAmerican Great Lakes combined, 说明比较的是水中沉积矿物的多少等。不加说明的比较结构放在句末如A选项,不会有问题,因为前文已经提到fresh water,实际上已经限制了比较的范围。

------from laizi
http://forum.chasedream.com/foru ... ight=prep%2B07%2B33
作者: DY567    时间: 2016-2-25 07:57
A decade after initiating the nation's most comprehensive and aggressive antismoking program, per capita consumption of cigarettes in California declined from over 125 packs annually per person to about 60, a drop more than twice as great as in the nation as a whole.

(A) per capita consumption of cigarettes in California declined from over 125 packs annually per person to about 60, a drop more than twice as great as
(B) annual per capita consumption of cigarettes in California declined from over 125 packs to about 60, more than twice as great as that
(C) California's annual per capita consumption of cigarettes declined from over 125 packs per person to about 60, more than twice as great as the drop
(D) California has seen per capita consumption of cigarettes decline from over 125 packs annually to about 60, a drop more than twice as great as that
(E) California has seen annual per capita consumption of cigarettes decline from over 125 packs per person to about 60, more than twice as great as that

我的做法是:
1.句子开头说开始了一个什么什么计划,这个计划是个人开始的么?往后看,后面有California,显然是加州在开始一个计划,即主语是California,ABC排除。
2. E: per capita和per person语义重复,错;more than twice修饰了decline from over 125 packs per person to about 60,没有D中直接用一个名drop代替整个decline的动作更来得简洁,而且语义清晰。因此D正确。

作者: GMAT要上700    时间: 2017-8-12 16:28
more than 那句话可以做主语吗?感觉只是modifier 呀。排除A是觉得不是一个完整的句子
作者: yuoasd    时间: 2018-6-15 10:40
E选项的比较有问题,不能说贝加尔湖超过了五大湖总和,应该是贝加尔湖的水量超过了五大湖总和
作者: Brandon12    时间: 2018-11-21 10:52
minirainbow 发表于 2008-10-26 22:25
33. more than 300 rivers在这边我认为就是句子的主词,并没有修饰谁然后后面的more than all the North Am ...

原文说的是湖比湖大,不是淡水比湖大,而且开头while看着也难受。。。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3