ChaseDream
标题: 大全-19-14 为什么A有关？ [打印本页]
作者: siebel 时间: 2003-5-5 01:27
标题: 大全-19-14 为什么A有关？
A是个weaken答案。可是，打电话时间长短这个比较点原文不存在呀？谢谢！
14. Both Writewell and Express provide round-the-clock
telephone assistance to any customer who uses their
word-processing software. Since customers only call
the hot lines when they find the software difficult to
use, and the Writewell hot line receives four times as
many calls as the Express hot line, Writewell’s word-
processing software must be more difficult to use
than Express’s.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the
argument above?
(A) Calls to the Express hot line are almost twice as
long, on average, as are calls to the Writewell
hot line.
(B) Express has three times the number of word-
processing software customers that Writewell
has.
(C) Express receives twice as many letters of com-
plaint about its word-processing software as
Writewell receives about its word-processing
software.
(D) The number of calls received by each of the two
hot lines has been gradually increasing.
(E) The Writewell hot-line number is more widely
publicized than the Express hot-line number.
作者: mindfree 时间: 2003-5-5 01:53
A是weaken吗? 如果文章里没有给出逻辑关系,就要看common sense是不是可以解释. 我感觉A起到的weaken作用很小, 因为customer service电话时间长短和difficult to use的关系不是很直接. E肯定是weaken, C肯定不是weaken. 所以要选most weaken, 就选E喽.
作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-5-5 07:06
E为什么削弱啊？
作者: 1stzhang 时间: 2003-5-5 13:42
A是有关的，出现了原文的对象calls,出现了原文的性质点---两个公司业务之间的比较。
round-the-clock就是时间。
作者: mindfree 时间: 2003-5-5 21:06
同意1stzhang的意见, 如果hotline总有人打电话进来, 就有影响了.
E的weaken在于指出其它原因解释现象, 作用等同于A. A指出电话量少是因为每一个电话的时间长. E指出电话量少是因为大家不知道这个电话.
作者: siebel 时间: 2003-5-6 22:57
谢谢各位！仔细研究，有如下体会，不知是否恰当。
call的时间长短和次数，都是call的性质。即：call有long and times（有没有）。所以，比较点无论是long还是times，都是原文提到的。不过如此一来，round-the-clock就显多余，因为无论round-the-clock是否存在，都有如上结论。
谢谢！
作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-5-6 23:04
GMAT中的削弱， 我经常觉得一时间转不过弯来。
经MINDFREE一说才恍然大悟。
作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-5-6 23:05
可是，A为什么会加强呢？
作者: mindfree 时间: 2003-5-7 01:21
A是weaken..但是说回来, 如果Express每个电话的时间是Writewell的两倍,但是W的电话数量是E的四倍,还是说明W的电话要多于E...weaken的作用还是要弱于E
作者: albert 时间: 2003-5-9 00:10
厉害厉害。。我原来做题目从来没想那么多，胡里糊涂的.
可是mindfree，为什么C不是削弱呢？ 原文说， 因为电话多说明W公司的软件不好用。
结论是 W公司的软件不好用。。C说更多的人写信抱怨Express公司的软件不好用。。直接批驳结论。
另：我觉得A不是WEAKEN。。因为需要加入太多的假设。。原文只讨论的是电话的次数。。A是电话的时间。。电话的时间和电话次数要挂上勾需要很多假设，而不是COMMON SENSE能解决的。。（比如，假如两公司的电话门数能保证所有打进电话的人即刻打通，则电话时间和电话次数就没关系了）。。。所以我的理解是做题如果需要加入太多假设的应该不多。。
但是，我有时候搞不清哪些是COMMON SENSE，哪些是自己强加的ASSUMPTION。。。mindfree,你是如何解决的？
谢谢！
作者: mindfree 时间: 2003-5-9 01:33
sorry...C是削弱. 我没有看到letter of complaint. 我原来的意思是如果只有letter而不指出letter的性质,C就不是weaken, 因为letter和difficulty的关系没有建立起来.
至于common sense, 我的感觉是越低级越好, 比如说:利率上涨,利息增加; 通货膨胀-->物价上涨; 工资低和工作环境差-->雇员不满. 这些都是基本真理. 至于度, 要在平时做题是体会和把握. 在做题时绝对不要用自己的专业知识.
作者: 向上爬的猪 时间: 2006-12-4 20:44
以下是引用siebel在2003-5-5 1:27:00的发言：
A是个weaken答案。可是，打电话时间长短这个比较点原文不存在呀？谢谢！
14. Both Writewell and Express provide round-the-clock
telephone assistance to any customer who uses their
word-processing software. Since customers only call
the hot lines when they find the software difficult to
use, and the Writewell hot line receives four times as
many calls as the Express hot line, Writewell’s word-
processing software must be more difficult to use
than Express’s.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the
argument above?
(A) Calls to the Express hot line are almost twice as
long, on average, as are calls to the Writewell
hot line.
(B) Express has three times the number of word-
processing software customers that Writewell
has.
(C) Express receives twice as many letters of com-
plaint about its word-processing software as
Writewell receives about its word-processing
software.
(D) The number of calls received by each of the two
hot lines has been gradually increasing.
(E) The Writewell hot-line number is more widely
publicized than the Express hot-line number.
B
作者: 笨笨可可 时间: 2008-7-1 03:16
B为什么加强阿？
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |