ChaseDream

标题: [原创]请教一道逻辑GWD4-Q31,很有价值的一道题 [打印本页]

作者: shopping_han 时间: 2008-8-20 17:45
标题: [原创]请教一道逻辑GWD4-Q31,很有价值的一道题

Q31:

Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada’s Kodlunarn
Island examined for gold content. Because high gold content was reported, Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions. Neither expedition found any gold there. Modern analysis of the island’s soil indicates a very low gold content. Thus the methods used to determine the gold content of Frobisher’s samples must have been inaccurate.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

The gold content of the soil on Kodlunarn
Island is much lower today than it was in the sixteenth century.
The two mining expeditions funded by Elizabeth I did not mine the same part of Kodlunarn
Island.
The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by Frobisher were different from those generally used in the sixteenth century.
Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for gold content.
Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined.

答案是E，我选的D，请n人指教，谢谢

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-8-26 1:49:51编辑过]

作者: shopping_han 时间: 2008-8-26 01:50
大家帮帮忙哦：）

作者: mac_bobo 时间: 2008-8-26 05:52

Please read the choice D again. It is not relevant if he examined other sand. It is important if the sand sample he claims to find gold is really from Kodlunarn island.

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)