ChaseDream

标题: OG11请大家帮我分析下 [打印本页]

作者: chenliqiang    时间: 2008-8-14 10:09
标题: OG11请大家帮我分析下

41. Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied. Congress has been required to call a conven­tion for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legisla­tures of two-thirds of the states.

(A)             was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it

(B)              was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consider­ation of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(C)             was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(D)             has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

(E)              has never been applied. Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amend­ments to the document when formally asked to do so

 答案是E没有错,但不清楚Under a provision of the Constitution that 
      has never been applied. 这个是什么结构阿,修饰CONGRESS吗, 为什么这种结构可以单独一个句子,请教了.


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-8-14 10:20:22编辑过]

作者: lijiaxuan810823    时间: 2008-8-14 10:43
我觉得主要是根据后面的so来排除abc的,it指代有问题,再者whereby出现有点改变原意,再看到你说的问题,想一下用has been表示对现在的影响,而如果用过去式只是表示过去的一个动作或结果,和后面感觉时态又有点不太一致,当然了,我也选错了,看了答案觉得应该是这样
作者: leelufei    时间: 2008-8-14 11:00

under a provision ... 是做状语,所以连词whereby就不需要了。

that has never been applied 是定语从句,修饰provision。

个人看法!


作者: chenliqiang    时间: 2008-8-14 11:50
这个我清楚地,可是,这个是不是介词短语阿,如果是介词短语怎么能独立成句啊.
作者: iamwuyan    时间: 2008-8-14 13:22
Under a provision of the Constitution+THAT引导的修饰CONSTITUTION的定语从句, 大意是在(...样的)宪法的规定下
这个短语在这个句子中应该做状语的功能
举个例子, 跟In this situation, I decided to hold on 里的In this situation在句子结构上起一个作用

作者: yifan326    时间: 2008-8-14 14:21

Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied.

大虾们 他问的是 这个最后是个句号不是 逗号 你们说是状语重句,但是它是一个独立的句子 而不是句子中的状语.

我也不明白 为什么是这样的.


作者: chenliqiang    时间: 2008-8-27 00:24
对了,我想问的也是这样...




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3