ChaseDream

标题: [求助]再请教GWD3-Q22 [打印本页]

作者: 2BLidr 时间: 2008-8-13 15:38
标题: [求助]再请教GWD3-Q22

On account of a law passed in 1993, making it a crime punishable by imprisonment that a United States citizen hold gold in the form of bullion or coins, immigrants found that on arrival in the United States they had to surrender all of the gold they had brought with them.

A. On account of a law passed in 1993, making it a crime punishable by imprisonment that a

United States

citizen hold

B. With a law passed in 1933 that makes it a crime punishable by imprisonment that a United States citizen hold

C. A law passed in 1933 that made it a crime punishable by imprisonment for a United States citizen holding

D. Because of a law passed in 1933 making it a crime punishable by imprisonment for a United States citizen to hold

E. Due to a law being passed in 1933 that makes it a crime punishable by imprisonment for a United States citizen to hold

答案是D

我的理解是：

A，B中hold的数不对，应该用单数

C，A law和immigrants构成双主语，不对

E，pass是一次性动作，不能用being passed来修饰law，ing分词是持续的概念。

作者: teddylydia 时间: 2008-8-13 22:07
看到ving/ved..., s+v句型先考慮主詞是否一致
根據題義，法律不是移民制定的，所以原句錯
with有連帶...、隨著...的意思，通常與s+v動作同時發生，所以用在這裡會怪怪的

作者: 2BLidr 时间: 2008-8-13 22:13

谢谢楼上。

A，B中hold的数不对，应该用单数

C，A law和immigrants构成双主语，不对

E，pass是一次性动作，不能用being passed来修饰law，ing分词是持续的概念。

作者: 2BLidr 时间: 2008-8-13 22:17

谢谢2楼，我本来贴了我的解释，可能是由于直接从word考过来出错了。

我的理解是

A，B中hold的数不对，应该用单数

C，A law和immigrants构成双主语，不对

E，pass是一次性动作，不能用being passed来修饰law，ing分词是持续的概念。

我认为这里是使用了习惯搭配be punishable for sth（由于…而受惩罚）。但是我不明白D中的it指代什么？

作者: cestmoilance 时间: 2008-8-13 22:26

it means

for a United States citizen to hold gold in the form of bullion or coins

so called "xian xing" too long to follow the verb make....can't type chinese here

作者: teddylydia 时间: 2008-8-13 22:54
it 應該指a United States citizen hold gold in the form of bullion or coins

作者: cestmoilance 时间: 2008-8-13 23:07

以下是引用teddylydia在2008-8-13 22:54:00的发言：
it 應該指a United States citizen hold gold in the form of bullion or coins

I don't think so

You can't make a citizen a crime

You can make an action a crime.

You can make a citizen a criminal

作者: teddylydia 时间: 2008-8-14 15:09

以下是引用cestmoilance在2008-8-13 23:07:00的发言：

I don't think so

You can't make a citizen a crime

You can make an action a crime.

You can make a citizen a criminal

你可能誤會了

我的意思是原題裡那句話所指的那件事

其實跟你的意見是一樣的喔

本人懶的打字所以就直接copy過來了

作者: 2BLidr 时间: 2008-8-15 18:04

本人愚钝，还是不理解为什么it指代a United States citizen to hold...，a United States citizen to hold...不是应该与for构成介词短语表示punishable的原因吗-因为a United States citizen to hold...而应受处罚？

作者: summerwy 时间: 2008-8-22 19:24

make it (形式主语) adj./n. + for sb to do/ that从句

it作为形式主语指代后边的for sb to do/that从句

作者: tracypiao 时间: 2008-11-7 10:31

楼上说的对，it是形式主语 to hold 是真主！

作者: ashleyyuan 时间: 2008-11-10 02:18
标题: 回复：（2BLidr）[求助]再请教GWD3-Q22

這個句子有兩個部份，主要子句跟從屬子句。主要子句部份沒問題，問題出在從屬子句。

A On account of是「由於」的意思，後面接的是名詞而不是句子，這邊的passed應該是分詞形容law，

That 子句裡的主詞是a United States citizen，使用的動詞應該是holds而不是hold.

B 句子語意改變了，變成「伴隨著法律通過條文……，移民……｣，就語意來講，移民並不會伴隨著條文而怎樣怎樣。

C 兩個句子當中缺乏合適的連接詞，變成run-on sentence，且改變原句從屬意思。.

E 錯的地方在於being passed形容law. 動詞型態應該用主動而非被動型態的分詞。

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-11-10 2:25:43编辑过]

作者: elaine1031 时间: 2009-7-17 15:44
up

作者: 北极虾仁 时间: 2009-8-4 19:31
看看

作者: alibaba_2009 时间: 2009-8-7 19:27
GWD3-Q22中的C：错误也可以理解为把A law作为immigrant的同位语，逻辑上有歧义。

作者: zhanhualv 时间: 2010-9-12 09:43
make it ....that
make it.....to do
两个it都能做形式宾语吧:如都能做形式主语一样。
例如：It is good for you to go to bed early
It is good that you go to bed early

所以，AC排除靠的是hold是原型，应该用holds

作者: qinqinyu 时间: 2013-7-14 16:30
A“,making”使得这个动作的逻辑主语变成了这个句子的主语——immigrants.
B选项第二个that变成引导一个修饰imprisonment的从句了，不对
E 选项，due to 一般不能置于句首

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)