ChaseDream

标题: 对GWD-8-20的新理解 [打印本页]

作者: Zspirit    时间: 2008-8-12 17:58
标题: 对GWD-8-20的新理解

GWD-8-Q20:
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

A, Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
B, Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
C, The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
D, The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
E, The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it
答案是D

关于这道题的争论非常激烈,自己一开始做的时候也做错了,但在看了答案和前人的讨论后,个人认为这道题根本就不是在考not only...but also...这个结构,它纯粹是一个大幌子!其实就是一个很简单的句子结构,正如D选项所表达的。
not only...but also...中省略号的两个部分表达的应该是相同的意思,但是在这道题里,两个句子表达的却是相反的意思:
第一个句子说,毁林开荒能够创造更多的农场(因为有地了)并且提供了家和家具(被砍伐的树木可以用来盖房子做家具),这些是有利的一面
第二个句子就在说有害的一面——但是(but)毁林开荒(it)也(also)会加速地表腐蚀和森林消失。
所以个人认为D选项的but it also只表达了一种“带有转折的也”,而不是not only...but also...中的第二部分
个人浅见,请NN们鉴定


作者: connie4895    时间: 2008-8-13 14:40

同意!! not only....but also.....连接的句子应该是语气态度一致的,而不是对立的。


作者: sandy07627    时间: 2008-8-30 12:24
同意,我也选了D的。
作者: xiaoniuren    时间: 2009-7-28 11:17
DING




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3