ChaseDream
标题: 求助PP58 [打印本页]
作者: tinywhite 时间: 2008-8-11 11:54
标题: 求助PP58
Diesel engines burn as much as 30% less fuel than gasoline engines of comparable size, as well as emitting far less carbon dioxide gas and far fewer of the other gasses that have been implicated in global warming.
A. of comparable size, as well as emitting far less carbon dioxide gas and far fewer of the other gasses that have
B. of comparable size, as well as emit far less carbon dioxide gas and far fewer of the other gasses having
C. of comparable size, and also they emit far fewer carbon dioxide and other gasses that have
D. that have a comparable size, and also they emit far fewer of the other gasses having
E. that have a comparable size, as well as emitting far fewer of the other gasses having
C为何不对呢?
作者: georgetseng 时间: 2008-8-11 12:44
C)中,fewer应为less,因为是指更少量的:更少种类(fewer)的二氧化碳和其它废气在这里语义不通。另外,“and also they”应为“and they also”或“and also, they”,虽然不是主要错误。
作者: tinywhite 时间: 2008-8-11 13:01
谢谢2楼指点
可是, 为什么A中的as well as后面可以跟emitting而不是emit呢?
作者: georgetseng 时间: 2008-8-11 13:16
这个前面有人说过了,xxx do sth, as well as doing sth是固定结构
作者: tinywhite 时间: 2008-8-11 15:56
厄... 还好遇见这道题, 否则这个结构这辈子都不知道了..
非常感谢
作者: tianyi_2003 时间: 2008-10-15 22:49
以下是引用georgetseng在2008-8-11 13:16:00的发言:
这个前面有人说过了,xxx do sth, as well as doing sth是固定结构
as well as do
as well as doing这两个结构都有而且都对的,不能判断.
作者: joywu1221 时间: 2008-10-16 01:10
同意6楼的说法!
作者: LUCIE_SIMON 时间: 2009-5-21 14:48
以下是引用georgetseng在2008-8-11 12:44:00的发言:
C)中,fewer应为less,因为是指更少量的:更少种类(fewer)的二氧化碳和其它废气在这里语义不通。另外,“and also they”应为“and they also”或“and also, they”,虽然不是主要错误。
恩,可不可以这样理解呢,是fewer (carbon dioxide and other gasses ),所以用fewer???
作者: 飞不高 时间: 2009-5-21 16:37
以下是引用georgetseng在2008-8-11 12:44:00的发言:
C)中,fewer应为less,因为是指更少量的:更少种类(fewer)的二氧化碳和其它废气在这里语义不通。另外,“and also they”应为“and they also”或“and also, they”,虽然不是主要错误。
agree
less modify the "gas" itself,
fewer modify the "gases", plural when refer to different kinds of gas
作者: LUCIE_SIMON 时间: 2009-5-24 01:32
还是不知道C怎么不对了,顶上去~~
作者: LUCIE_SIMON 时间: 2009-5-24 11:46
up
作者: LUCIE_SIMON 时间: 2009-5-24 22:40
up
作者: AlienX 时间: 2009-5-25 02:56
C中的fewer carbon dioxide不對, carbon dioxide是不可數
用less
作者: LUCIE_SIMON 时间: 2009-5-25 11:49
以下是引用AlienX在2009-5-25 2:56:00的发言:
C中的fewer carbon dioxide不對, carbon dioxide是不可數
用less
可不可以把它和后面other gases放一起看,就是fewer了~
作者: AlienX 时间: 2009-5-25 13:52
不可以
這題的other gases是被看成可數是因為它想表達不同種的gases
而carbon dioxide全世界就只有一種, 所以只能用less來修它的量.
作者: edogawaconan 时间: 2009-7-18 22:00
see see~
作者: scarlett8327 时间: 2009-7-25 11:21
kan
作者: jasonleo 时间: 2009-7-28 00:43
ding
作者: pwss 时间: 2009-8-4 13:13
作者: pwss 时间: 2009-8-4 13:18
作者: INCHASEDREAM 时间: 2009-8-4 13:40
作者: lala974 时间: 2011-6-17 03:02
up up
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |