111. The stated goal of the government’s funding program for the arts is to encourage the creation of works of artistic excellence. Senator Beton claims, however, that a government-funded artwork can never reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist because artists, like anyone else who accepts financial support, will inevitably try to please those who control the distribution of that support. Senator Beton concludes that government funding of the arts not only is a burden on taxpayers but also cannot lead to the creation of works of true artistic excellence.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which Senator Beton’s argument is based?
A. Most taxpayers have little or no interest in the creation of works of true artistic excellence.
B. Government funding of the arts is more generous than other financial support most artists receive.
C. Distribution of government funds for the arts is based on a broad agreement as to what constitutes artistic excellence.
D. Once an artist has produced works of true artistic excellence, he or she will never accept government funding.
E. A contemporary work of art that does not reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist cannot be a work of true artistic excellence.
答案E,开始我也选E，后来发觉用非=Weaken的原则来看，D不是更好？只要有真艺术，就不接受政府资助。取非，仍然接受资助->政府资助可以有真艺术
大家看看是否合理啊？
楼主是想说 D 取非削弱, 因此是assumpt? 这个说法也是有道理的, 但是问题是, 楼主取非做的不正确
D说: 真艺术->不接受基金, 取非为: 真艺术 不一定 不接受基金, 这是取非, 而楼主是把前件取非, 后件也取非, 然后颠倒, 这和原来的表述是完全一个意思,
如: A->B, 取非为A不一定推出B, 而 非B->非A 在逻辑上 可以理解为 A->B, 一模一样, 这个是充分条件的重要结论, 呵呵
而D取非后, 也无法削弱结论, 具体楼主再想一下, 如果想不清楚...我再解释, 今天头晕...呵呵
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |