In 1850 Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights and for changes in the married women’s property laws.
答案为E,
A的错误就只是因为a treatise 的指代不明确吧？如果用the treatise是不是就对了？
The normative model of strategic decision-making suggests that executives examine a firm’s external environment and internal conditions, and in using the set of objective criteria they derive from these analyses, can decide on a strategy.
选D
A中的can decide…和examine不并列。
A，D中的Using 和in using好像没有区别？
In 1850 Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights and for changes in the married women’s property laws.
答案为E,
A的错误就只是因为a treatise 的指代不明确吧？如果用the treatise是不是就对了？
虽然看布懂说的啥意思，但是看倒CDE都是同位语， 多半就是它们了
另外同位语里面还有个平行argued for equal political and legal rights for women and for changes in the married women’s property laws
A这两点都不满足咯
虽然看布懂说的啥意思，但是看倒CDE都是同位语， 多半就是它们了
另外同位语里面还有个平行argued for equal political and legal rights for women and for changes in the married women’s property laws
A这两点都不满足咯
对哦，还有平行的问题！！！~
In 1850 Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in the treatise for equal political and legal rights for women and for changes in the married women’s property laws. 这么改一下总行了吧。LM 出了一本书，arguing for....A and for B...
这么改一下总行了吧。LM 出了一本书，arguing for....A and for B...
In 1850 Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights and for changes in the married women’s property laws.
答案为E,
A的错误就只是因为a treatise 的指代不明确吧？如果用the treatise是不是就对了？
The normative model of strategic decision-making suggests that executives examine a firm’s external environment and internal conditions, and in using the set of objective criteria they derive from these analyses, can decide on a strategy.
选D
A中的can decide…和examine不并列。
A，D中的Using 和in using好像没有区别？
这里还是using 好些吧， 说不上来到底有啥区别。 好像in doing 是要跟 冬冬搭配的，不能单独做状语吧，如果能的话，那还要分词干吗呢？
对哦，还有平行的问题！！！~
In 1850 Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in the treatise for equal political and legal rights for women and for changes in the married women’s property laws. 这么改一下总行了吧。LM 出了一本书，arguing for....A and for B...
这么改一下总行了吧。LM 出了一本书，arguing for....A and for B...
这么改一下总行了吧。LM 出了一本书，arguing for....A and for B...
你这样改语法上是没错了，但是逻辑意思上把 treatise 放哪儿呢？
67. Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients’ misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.
(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
Logical predication + Idiom
The original sentence contains an incorrect idiom and a misplaced modifier. The correct idiom in the active voice is one attributes x (an effect) toy (a cause).
In the passive voice, x (the effect) is attributed to y (the cause). The modifying phrase (in attributing...) incorrectly describes perpetrators when it should describe defense attorneys.
The best way to correct the sentence is to transform the modifying phrase into a subordinate clause that uses the idiom correctly: criminal or delinquent behavior (x) is attributed to (verb phrase) an allergy to some food (y).
这句的意思是说 in doing sth.只能修饰but之后的主语吧，而题目中的using是executive发出的动作？？
你这样改语法上是没错了，但是逻辑意思上把 treatise 放哪儿呢？
the treatise, 本身有一个定冠词，指代那本书？
67. Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients’ misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.
(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
Logical predication + Idiom
The original sentence contains an incorrect idiom and a misplaced modifier. The correct idiom in the active voice is one attributes x (an effect) toy (a cause).
In the passive voice, x (the effect) is attributed to y (the cause). The modifying phrase (in attributing...) incorrectly describes perpetrators when it should describe defense attorneys.
The best way to correct the sentence is to transform the modifying phrase into a subordinate clause that uses the idiom correctly: criminal or delinquent behavior (x) is attributed to (verb phrase) an allergy to some food (y).
这句的意思是说 in doing sth.只能修饰but之后的主语吧，而题目中的using是executive发出的动作？？
恩，同意你的说法， 但这个并不能说明in doing 和doing的区别啊
题目中using的逻辑主语是executive。
我对in doing的意见还是之前那个帖子。
恩，同意你的说法， 但这个并不能说明in doing 和doing的区别啊
题目中using的逻辑主语是executive。
我对in doing的意见还是之前那个帖子。
恩，的确那道题没体现两者的区别：
我查了一下朗文：in 有这个表示因果的含义
while doing something or while something is happening, and as a result of this
In all the confusion, it is quite possible that some people got tickets without paying.
In my excitement, I forgot all about the message.
in doing something
In trying to protect the queen, Howard had put his own life in danger.
这么看来，这里区别还是不大。相当于while using..
up
前加逗号， 另外引导一个句子， 一定要有主谓
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |