ChaseDream

标题: OG11(黄)-SC-63时态问题 [打印本页]

作者: sicivi    时间: 2008-8-4 03:45
标题: OG11(黄)-SC-63时态问题

63.   A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discourage poachers; the question is whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are trimmed.

(A) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are

(B) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one once their horns are

(C) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see rhinoceroses once the animals’ horns have been

(D) if tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses once the animals’ horns are

(E) if tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one after the animals’ horns have been

Logical predication + Diction + Verb form

The tourists are visiting for the purpose of seeing the rhinoceroses; purpose is expressed by using to, not by and. Since their could refer to either tourists or to rhinoceroses, it is inappropriately ambiguous whose horns are being trimmed. The verb following after should be the present perfect have been trimmed to reflect that the trimming must occur before the tourists arrive. When only two alternatives are possible, to continue to visit or not to continue to visit, whether (or whether or not) is properly used rather than if.

A     And see should be to see, their is ambiguous; are should be have been

B     Omitting rhinoceroses changes the meaning of the sentence; one has no referent; their absurdly and unambiguously refers to tourists; are should be have been

C     Correct. In this sentence, to correctly precedes see, it is clear that the horns belong to the animals; have been is the correct tense following once.

D     Whether is preferred to if, and see should be to see-, are should be have been

E      Whether is preferred to if, one has no referent

想问下如果不是用的have been而是are 是否也勉强可以(也就是说have been 不是一个唯一正确的答案,但是是一个更好的答案)?如果把它看作一个普通的条件从句的话,我们不是常常用一般现在时表示将来的么?


作者: rattledrum    时间: 2008-8-5 10:10
我觉得不可以。本题的问题就是:人们会不会因为犀牛被割掉角了,就不去公园看犀牛了。犀牛角被割一定是在人们去公园看之前完成了的,所以要用完成时。

作者: lazzycat_wxh    时间: 2008-8-8 02:20

同意lu的解释


作者: AlienX    时间: 2008-8-8 02:28
覺得are也可以
用解釋中的其他考點去eliminate吧...

作者: counyo    时间: 2008-8-15 21:50
B把their改成its就对了,因为前面是one
作者: yichousun    时间: 2008-8-15 23:17
在汇总的帖子里有精彩的解释,自己去看看吧
作者: skyyuki11    时间: 2008-8-15 23:45
请问汇总的帖子怎么找啊?谢谢
作者: cestmoilance    时间: 2008-8-16 00:32

once A have been done, B.....

using "have been" to emphasize that A happened before B and A is a cause for B's happening.


作者: cestmoilance    时间: 2008-8-16 00:33
I noticed that in GMAT, whenever "have done" is used, there is always logic in it.........
作者: 成思    时间: 2008-8-27 06:38
汇总贴就是OG语法区里的OG讲解。
作者: endlessfrenz    时间: 2008-8-27 11:50
我也觉得ARE可以,并不必须要用完成时,因为after their horns are已经表示了牛角被割了




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3