ChaseDream

标题: 求助prep1-57 [打印本页]

作者: lovkobe    时间: 2008-7-22 22:55
标题: 求助prep1-57

57. The Anasazi settlements at Chaco Canyon were built on a spectacular scale with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each, were connected by a complex regional system of roads.
(A) with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each, were
(B) with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each,
(C) of more than 75 carefully engineered structures of up to 600 rooms, each that had been
(D) of more than 75 carefully engineered structures of up to 600 rooms and with each
(E) of more than 75 carefully engineered structures of up to 600 rooms each had been

答案是B,但是我选的是D,有没有人可以帮我分析一下句子的结构,有些晕了,谢谢啦~


作者: louislao    时间: 2008-7-23 02:10
首先 用of 修饰的是scale 而不是原句的built  你个以考虑如果of 修饰的是scale那么脱去of后的修饰成分, 句子就会变成The Anasazi settlements at Chaco Canyon were built on a spectacular scale 这样原句的逻辑意思就被掩埋了, 而且D项后面的and with没有平行对象
作者: AlienX    时间: 2008-7-23 02:45
with不能加句子在後
作者: nemo11    时间: 2008-7-23 06:30
把of up to 600 rooms each看成是插入语,前边的structure  connected by...
作者: i3like1105    时间: 2008-11-11 22:30

1)“on a spectacular scale“是副词,大规模地,所以先把这部分忽略不看;

句子结构是:

2)Settlements were built with 75 structures, of up to 600 rooms each, connected by…

 

其中, of up to 600 rooms each是插入语,修饰settlements,再把这部分忽略不看 ---

 

句子简化为:

 

3)settlements were built with 75 structures, connected by...

 

其中,connected修饰邻近的structures

 


作者: lijiahui0422    时间: 2009-7-5 10:15


这里的scale of 是被分开的固定搭配么,那为什么不干脆把scale放在后面呢...?

我是这么想的,of up to 600 rooms each 是修饰structure的,也就是structure, up to 600 rooms of each,这里的scale 和of 没有联系

不知道自己的理解有无道理,这道题的讨论好分散...每个帖子里都只有一页

希望能继续深入讨论下去~


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-7-5 10:18:03编辑过]

作者: vivian0331    时间: 2009-7-9 23:14

Killer的解释很有道理:

请见下贴6楼:

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&replyID=2359209&id=252299&skin=0

同意楼上的,有两个介词短语修饰  scale : 1)with more than... structurs 2) of up to 600 rooms each room connected by...road。

因为2)太长了所以后置,这种结构不用and连接。OG 10th 里面有这样的例子。


作者: AlienX    时间: 2009-7-10 07:53
umm...不太make sense...room不可能被roads connected....房間在街上太可怕了~

作者: judyenglish    时间: 2009-8-4 16:04
ding
作者: happyggggg    时间: 2009-9-24 12:42
up
作者: gsj677    时间: 2009-10-15 11:26
uuuuuuuuuuup
作者: 妖怪毛毛    时间: 2009-10-27 11:24

作者: ageng    时间: 2009-11-3 10:13
1)“on a spectacular scale“是副词,大规模地,所以先把这部分忽略不看;
句子结构是:
2)Settlements were built with 75 structures, of up to 600 rooms each, connected by…
其中, of up to 600 rooms each是插入语,修饰settlements,再把这部分忽略不看 ---
句子简化为:
3)settlements were built with 75 structures, connected by...
其中,connected修饰邻近的structures
-- by 会员 i3like1105 (2008/11/11 22:30:00)




觉得这个对。但我有个问题of up to 600 rooms each,这个each……of结构为何要倒装。一开始居然把它和独立主格弄混了,晕@@!

我现在觉得of up to 600 rooms each应该是同位语结构,但仍然不明白为何要倒着写。,“+each”放在句尾做同位语是很好的,但把each放在后面就不知道each修饰什么了 求解求解~~~
作者: lorrain_cc    时间: 2009-11-4 02:58
我觉得是因为如果把each正放,就会修饰structures了,其实LS也说插入语是修饰settlements的吧?
所以each of up to ...还应该是独立主格,
作者: ageng    时间: 2009-11-14 14:30
楼上MM~

我上条回复弄错了, of up to 600 rooms each是插入语,修饰应该是修饰structures。每一个structure有600个room。

connected by…也是修饰structure。

each of up to ...为each+介短,是独立主格作同位语。

正因为我觉得,of up to 600 rooms each,修饰前面的structures,所以正序很好,不明白为何each置后。

MM的意思是不是of……each结构修饰的是settlements,所以为了避免each就近修饰structures,而将其置后?可以这样么?
作者: jocker    时间: 2010-6-1 23:23
同样的问题,这边“of up to 600 rooms each”中的each为什么要后置呢?

感觉“each of up to 600 rooms”应该更好,each紧跟structures,更清晰--
作者: 10gmat    时间: 2010-6-2 00:11
我google了一下,of up to 出现了这些例句:
1,Obama reports wealth of up to $7.7 million
2,Threat of up to two million Muslim terrorists, warns community leader

看来of up to 前面加上名词是正确的表达方式。
那么这么说each of up to 600 rooms 也是正确的,each 表示structures
作者: jocker    时间: 2010-6-2 22:46
我google了一下,of up to 出现了这些例句:
1,Obama reports wealth of up to $7.7 million
2,Threat of up to two million Muslim terrorists, warns community leader

看来of up to 前面加上名词是正确的表达方式。
那么这么说each of up to 600 rooms 也是正确的,each 表示structures
-- by 会员 10gmat (2010/6/2 0:11:34)


谢谢,说的很清楚。
可是根据独立主格的规则,这边是应该用“each of up to 600 rooms “, 为什么题中要将each放到后面去呢?
我总感觉"of up to 600 rooms each"读起来很拗口。这是一种什么结构呢?
作者: kevin512813    时间: 2010-8-1 21:18
个人意见:each 放在后面,使得过去分词connected临近修饰each所指的名词,即engineered structure
避免过去分词临近修饰room而引起歧义。
作者: keith139    时间: 2010-8-12 17:21
57. The Anasazi settlements at Chaco Canyon were built on a spectacular scale, with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each,  were connected by a complex regional system of roads.
(A) with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each, were
(B) with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each,
(C) of more than 75 carefully engineered structures of up to 600 rooms, each that had been
(D) of more than 75 carefully engineered structures of up to 600 rooms and with each
(E) of more than 75 carefully engineered structures of up to 600 rooms each had been

答案是B,但是我选的是D,有没有人可以帮我分析一下句子的结构,有些晕了,谢谢啦~

-- by 会员 lovkobe (2008/7/22 22:55:00)



提点我个人的不同理解,我还是觉得后半部分是 with引导的一个独立主格,中间有个插入语“of up to 600 rooms each”,后边是V-ed的形式。总体来看就是with stuctures connected by……,如果把each看成独立主格的话整体结构很混乱的说
作者: schuminello    时间: 2010-8-28 23:18
我觉得of和with不是考点。
D,E错是因为of up to 600 rooms each在句子中的作用改变了,属于不忠实原文。
C因为had been 时态错了。
作者: imagelan    时间: 2010-9-11 05:13
57. The Anasazi settlements at Chaco Canyon were built on a spectacular scale, with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each,  were connected by a complex regional system of roads.
(A) with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each, were
(B) with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each,
(C) of more than 75 carefully engineered structures of up to 600 rooms, each that had been
(D) of more than 75 carefully engineered structures of up to 600 rooms and with each
(E) of more than 75 carefully engineered structures of up to 600 rooms each had been

答案是B,但是我选的是D,有没有人可以帮我分析一下句子的结构,有些晕了,谢谢啦~

-- by 会员 lovkobe (2008/7/22 22:55:00)




提点我个人的不同理解,我还是觉得后半部分是 with引导的一个独立主格,中间有个插入语“of up to 600 rooms each”,后边是V-ed的形式。总体来看就是with stuctures connected by……,如果把each看成独立主格的话整体结构很混乱的说
-- by 会员 keith139 (2010/8/12 17:21:32)



with 引导的独立主格是需要自带逻辑主语的。其形式为
with+n+doing/done
with+n+adj短语
with+n+prep短语
with+n+n
但是此处的with结构并没有一个n词可以作为它的逻主。所以,我觉得这里的with结构并非独立主格,而是一个普通的prep结构。with结构此处修饰的是动词built其逻主为settlements.

of up to 600 rooms each,是一个倒装了的独立主格结构。
作者: aquatic    时间: 2010-9-12 15:43
我觉得四楼说的好。我觉得我们的眼光被出题者的划线所干扰了,而他们的目的就是要这个效果。

如果没有划线,我们会顺利看到句子主干settlements were built with XX structures
但是出题者特意在 built 后面加了on a spectacular scale ,然后后面顺手加划线,给出迷惑答案 of 和正确答案 with,就是为了考验你是否能把scale和句子主干分开(不幸的是我也中招了)

所以,当我看到四楼解答后,可以立刻排除C、D、E答案
作者: 西西zsx    时间: 2011-1-23 19:48
ding~
作者: powers    时间: 2011-3-8 23:13
总算了解了
作者: 根儿哥1989    时间: 2011-3-22 22:36
这个题选择C  我想问一下and 后面resembling 与谁并列呢?
我感觉这个题选择E  因为定语从句有很好的修饰作用 并且显示出了“被发现” 的被动语态  可是又考虑到THAT 不能裸奔 并且THAT+IS 被视为不简洁  所以 即使看了CDerS 的解释后还是很纠结  请帮忙解答谢谢~~
作者: 根儿哥1989    时间: 2011-3-22 22:38
不好意思  发错了 应该是旧PREP的56题
56.    (27435-!-item-!-188;#058&003186)

First discovered more than 30 years ago, Lina's sunbird, a four-and-a-half-inch animal found in the Philippines and that resembles a hummingbird, has shimmering metallic colors on its head; a brilliant orange patch, bordered with red tufts, in the center of its breast; and a red eye.

(A) found in the Philippines and that resembles
(B) found in the Philippines and that, resembling
(C) found in the Philippines and resembling
(D) that is found in the Philippines and it resembles
(E) that is found in the Philippines and that, resembling
作者: jiangmengjuan    时间: 2011-8-21 15:59
ding




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3