ChaseDream

标题: [讨论]GWD7-Q13 [打印本页]

作者: 甜甜圈儿 时间: 2008-7-21 23:47
标题: [讨论]GWD7-Q13

GWD7-Q13:

Like the grassy fields and old pastures that the upland sandpiper needs for feeding and nesting when it returns in May after wintering in the Argentine Pampas, the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in farming practices.

A. the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in

B. the bird itself is vanishing in the northeastern United States as a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in

C. that the birds themselves are vanishing in the northeastern United States is due to residential and industrial development and changes to

D. in the northeastern United States, sandpipers’ vanishing is due to residential and industrial development and to changes in

E. in the northeastern United States, the sandpipers’ vanishing, a result of residential and industrial development and changing

答案是B，可是选了之后the bird不就不平行了吗？like不是要比较对象平行么...？晕了，XDJM们帮帮我吧~

作者: 甜甜圈儿 时间: 2008-7-22 23:37

谁来救救我...？

作者: dingxiang 时间: 2008-7-23 09:07

怎么就不平行了呢？

记住逻辑意思的平行》形式的平行

这里grassy fields and old pastures 和bird 不挺平行的嘛？两者都有共同点，就是都在消失啊

具体的可见置顶贴里面的讨论

作者: nemo11 时间: 2008-7-23 09:22

A. the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in

A错在哪儿呢？

作者: dingxiang 时间: 2008-7-23 09:44

逻辑错误

A. the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in

看到了么？

作者: nemo11 时间: 2008-7-23 10:02
原来是主谓不一致了，唉，眼神跑哪儿去了！

作者: dingxiang 时间: 2008-7-23 10:07

是逻辑错误

bird怎么会是result呢？

作者: 甜甜圈儿 时间: 2008-7-24 00:33

哦！对啦~怎么给忘了...谢谢啦：）

作者: nemo11 时间: 2008-7-24 04:48

以下是引用dingxiang在2008-7-23 10:07:00的发言：

是逻辑错误

bird怎么会是result呢？

明了，多谢dingxiang mm

作者: reallingling 时间: 2008-7-24 08:02
学习了，多谢

作者: raphael1234 时间: 2009-7-7 21:47

作者: vickeysa 时间: 2009-7-31 16:58
up

作者: yyq3000 时间: 2009-8-23 20:44
感谢

作者: lvbo 时间: 2010-5-9 23:54
我觉得不是这个错误，而是 the sandpipers vanishing vanishing是主动应该是被动

作者: lvbo 时间: 2010-5-9 23:55
vanishing
n.
1. a sudden or mysterious disappearance
2. suddenly disappearing from sight

作者: wangxiwei 时间: 2010-9-3 19:01
如果把 the sandpipers vanishing 看成统一体呢我当时选A就是这么看的

vanishing 未必就非要做现在分词把做动名词那么A不就可以说通了么?

作者: hanlei8492 时间: 2010-9-28 05:08

是逻辑错误
bird怎么会是result呢？

-- by 会员 dingxiang (2008/7/23 10:07:00)

我觉得问题应该不在这里，因为Sandpipers Vanishing是可以做一个名词的，这样就可以是Result。
关键的问题在于，sandpipers vanishing和土地不能并列，而鸟和土地是可以并列的，都是在消失的东西。

作者: hanlei8492 时间: 2010-9-28 05:09

是逻辑错误
bird怎么会是result呢？

-- by 会员 dingxiang (2008/7/23 10:07:00)

-- by 会员 hanlei8492 (2010/9/28 5:08:35)

当然，A如果想并列，就只能将Bird理解为这个并列的名词，那么就出现了逻辑不通，Bird不是Result的结果。

作者: ParkShanghai 时间: 2011-2-28 19:49
个人觉得此题即使是选择B项，整个句子还是语意有问题，该题不讨论也罢。

作者: gigi68788 时间: 2011-8-9 16:39

是逻辑错误
bird怎么会是result呢？

-- by 会员 dingxiang (2008/7/23 10:07:00)

-- by 会员 hanlei8492 (2010/9/28 5:08:35)

同意这位帅锅的看法！

作者: 逆水潜龙 时间: 2011-11-16 13:28
A错在vanishing与草地比较吧·

作者: windfog 时间: 2012-12-15 04:33
我觉得，如果是 vanishing of the sandpipers 或者 the sandpipers' vanishing 才可以作为一个result. 如原题vanishing in .....是定语。

为什么我感觉 the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development 里边 the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States整体作主语，是一个result呢？？

-- by 会员 494469902 (2012/12/3 19:00:31)

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)