关于OG11（黄皮）逻辑第60 、61 题之相关问题 - ChaseDream

疑惑1
Questions 60-61 are based on the following:
The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than the lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.
60.
If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?
(A) Some lawyers who now advertise will charge more for specific services if they do not have to specify fee arrangements in the advertisements.
(B) More consumers will use legal services if there are fewer restrictions on the advertising of legal services.
(C) If the restriction against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements is removed, more lawyers will advertise their services.
(D) If more lawyers advertise lower prices for specific services, some lawyers who do not advertise will also charge less than they currently charge for those services.
(E) If the only restrictions on the advertising of legal services were those that apply to every type of advertising, most lawyers would advertise their services.

答案是C，再看GWD2-Q5
Q5:
The total market value of real estate in Altonville has steadily declined over the past four years.
This decline has meant that the overall figure on which the city’s property tax is based ─ the assessed value of that real estate ─ has also declined.
Moreover, the percentage of assessed value that was paid as property taxes to the city did not change during this period.

The information above most strongly supports which of the following?

A. Money collected from property taxes provided most of Altonville’s revenue during the past four years.
B. The percentage of Altonville’s overall revenue that was collected from property taxes did not change over the past four years.
C. Altonville officials had proposed raising property tax rates during the past four years but never did so because of strong opposition from property owners.
D. The total amount of revenue that Altonville has collected from property taxes has declined over the past four years.
E. During the past four years, Altonville officials also did not increase tax rates on other sources of revenue such as retail sales or business profits.
此题答案是D.如果按照上面60题的思路，仅仅是重复题目的条件，那这题不应该选B吗？

疑惑2：
OG11的第61题，材料还是那段，题目是
61.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?
(A) The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.
(B) The state is unlikely to remove all the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.
(C) Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.
(D) Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.
(E) Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.

答案是E。 E不是反对题目的前提了吗？？？记得以前看过太傻GMAT资料汇总里面有一个
●　GMAT逻辑错误选项总结

作者: pinkkitty 时间: 2005-4-1 13:12

GMAT逻辑错误选项总结：二、反对前提的选项
那么这题怎么解释呢？
多谢各位兄弟姐妹解释解释啊，快考了，还有许多困惑呢，哎。。。

60题和gwd2-q5属于归纳类的题目,也就是从原文中可以得出哪些结论,所以这类题型的关键就是,原文中未提及的任何信息,都不应当出现;所以通常来说选项中出现绝对性的词汇,比如the only, the most这些的都要非常小心;

对广告法律服务的限制越少,越多的律师做服务广告,律师做了服务广告那么就会收比其他律师不做广告的收更少的钱.因此,如果政府停止了现有广告的限制,比如反对广告中提及费用的; 那么消费者的法律成本就会更加低.

a说一些现在做广告的律师会charge更多,原文没说;
b说更多消费者会使用法律服务,原文也没说;
c说如果限制取消,更多律师会做广告,原文有提及;留着
d说如果更多律师做低价的广告,一些不做广告的律师会charge更少,原文也没说
e一看到the only,就不是很舒服,删除;
只有c对

gwd的题目也是 d是最直接的答案
而b中和原文说的是两码事,原文说交地产税的估价比率没有变;b说a城市地产税收入所占比率没有变

原文大意就是说,做不做广告,律师费用降不降的问题
e是最直接的驳斥答案,原文说作广告,律师费用降价,e说做广告的律师不会降价,